Hour 1 opens with John Rush setting a hard-truth tone before diving into what he says is one of the clearest economic signals he’s seen heading into 2026. Drawing from firsthand experience at the Barrett-Jackson auto auction in Scottsdale, John asks a provocative question: What does massive spending on non-essential luxury items say about the real state of the economy? With record crowds, high-dollar purchases, and disposable income flowing freely, he challenges the constant crash narratives and warns listeners not to confuse debt concerns with an imminent collapse. The hour then pivots sharply to the controversial Minnesota ICE shooting.
SPEAKER 14 :
This is Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 03 :
You are going to shut your damn yapper and listen for a change because I got you pegged, sweetheart. You want to take the easy way out because you’re scared. And you’re scared because if you try and fail, there’s only you to blame. Let me break this down for you. Life is scary. Get used to it.
SPEAKER 07 :
There are no magical fixes. With your host, John Rush.
SPEAKER 03 :
My advice to you is to do what your parents did. Get a job, sir. You haven’t made everybody equal. You’ve made them the same, and there’s a big difference.
SPEAKER 11 :
Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know, you can’t explain. But you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life. That there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there. It is this feeling that has brought you to me.
SPEAKER 17 :
Are you crazy? Am I? Or am I so sane that you just blew your mind?
SPEAKER 14 :
It’s Rush to Reason with your host, John Rush, presented by Cub Creek Heating and Air Conditioning.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, hour number three, Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. Okay, our next guest joining us now, Alvin Louie joining us. Alvin, welcome back. How are you?
SPEAKER 08 :
Hey, thank you so much for having me. I so appreciate it, sir.
SPEAKER 13 :
Always a joy, a present of courage is a habit. We talk to you on a pretty frequent basis, and in this case, we were going to talk about, and probably will just for a moment, the Minnesota church, the service there that was, you know, people there harassing and so on, and there’s a lot more to that story. And then, of course, we’ve got other news to cover from Minnesota that happened over the weekend as well. It just continues, is my point, Alvin.
SPEAKER 08 :
It really does. It really does. And I’m happy to be back to continue our conversation, and certainly a lot’s happened since the last time I was on here.
SPEAKER 13 :
Let’s talk really quick about the agitator that was in the church service. And by the way, there was more than one agitator, but these are individuals, and it’s being proven over and over again, Alvin, that these are folk that are really being, quote-unquote, employed by the hard left, the Antifa left, if you would. It’s becoming more apparent all the time that that’s what’s happening.
SPEAKER 08 :
Absolutely it is. In fact, you know, we had booked this, you know, me being on talking to you, uh, last late last week and over the weekend, you wouldn’t believe it. We actually found that the organization Monica, Monica, uh, it’s M O N a R C a Monica, basically like a, like a butterfly. Their, their, their logo is a butterfly.
SPEAKER 09 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 08 :
And it’s, it’s an ice watch network. It’s an ice watch network that coordinates all that you’ve seen in Minnesota. The church, all the violence, all the protests, everything. And if you couldn’t believe this, John, we found their reference on Governor Walz’s government site.
SPEAKER 13 :
Oh, wow.
SPEAKER 08 :
They list them as a resource. They list their phone number. And then they also list yet another, a second, similar type of ice watch network. And so we are quite literally seeing that our government, the Minnesota Governor’s Administration, is partnering with these very NGOs that are orchestrating, paying, coordinating. these violence, and of course, including the church, the church attack.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and it’s, I mean, not that we had, I mean, I didn’t have any doubt from the get-go that that was going on. If you look back to all of the BLM protests and so on, it was very much similar. This is just a repeat of that, very orchestrated. These things are being done on purpose. They’re agitating. Right. you know, the Marxist movement, Alvin, is all about agitation, create chaos, you know, because at the end of the day, if government can come in and fix all of that, then of course, you know, they’re the answer. Now, the problem they’re having right now is they’re, quote-unquote, not the government, so they’re going to create even more chaos, because then when they’re in charge and chaos ends, well, now they’re the heroes.
SPEAKER 08 :
Exactly. And worse, they are, everything that you’re seeing on the ground, on the streets, is being taught at a much lower level because of the K-12 system, which is what obviously we do, and it encourages a habit. And so we’ve seen this being trained in kids as young as kindergarten, but of course they’re not going to say, go rush a church and go burn down a hotel and go throw bricks at officers. They’re not going to do that. At the kindergarten level, it’s about empathy. It’s about being kind. It’s about marginalized people. It’s about, well, America’s racist and middle schools, America’s racist and oppressive. And then by the time they get to high school, that’s why you see all these high schoolers march out of schools. Now, when they’re marching out of schools, they’re not throwing bricks, of course, but that’s training. True. And then by the time they get to the college age, then they’re throwing the bricks. when they come to get into the mid-20s and they’re throwing the bricks. And so this is what, so everything that you’re seeing, like with the Marnica and those kind of ice watch organizations, when we dug deeper, John, those organizations are funding nonprofits that are in our children’s schools. The books, the training, the way they train the teachers, the professional development, So everything you’re seeing – and the way I’ve been describing it, everything that you’re seeing on the street is an act three of a four-act play. Act four, the final act, being full-blown communism.
SPEAKER 13 :
No, you’re very right. Okay, so going over to what happened over the weekend, and this is where you may have some more information on this than I. I mean, I watched as much of the videotape on this particular – seen as I could. And I said it in the first hour, and I’ll say it again, Alvin, the tape that I see or the recordings that I see, the cell phone recordings and so on, they don’t really tell a lot. I mean, the news organizations, CNNs and so on of the like are out there dissecting these videos trying to tell you what happened. And I’ll just be straight up honest. I can watch a video myself, and there’s not that much there to really determine anything at the end of the day. So I’m sorry, these guys are wrong in their determination of at least the videos that I’m watching. Maybe they got better video, but I don’t think so. I think there’s only one or two small, you know, cell phone type videos running around. And what I would say, and this was my comments in the first hour, is, you know, is ICE perfect? Of course not, Alvin. There’s going to be mistakes made, and I get that on the same token. this particular individual that was there, and given the fact that he was armed and what he was wearing and even how he acted, I mean, this is not your average typical protester, meaning, I go back to your conversation a moment ago, in my opinion, this is a guy that’s got an inside edge on the things you’re talking about.
SPEAKER 08 :
Absolutely, because he’s trained to do these things. He didn’t just walk out of his apartment one day and say, hey, I’m going to do this. That’s right. He’s part of these signal networks that was exposed over the weekend. as well by another great account. And he’s part of these ice watch networks, the Monica type of ice watch networks. He might’ve been part of the Monica type of signal chats. And so, you know what, I’m going to, there’s a lot of people that are going to look at these videos when something happens, whether it’s with that lady that got shot or he, you know, this guy that got shot and everyone’s going to analyze it. But here’s what I want your audience to do. Okay? I want you to imagine yourself at work. So, like, John, you’re at work, right? You’re talking to me. And whoever, I want you to imagine. Now, I want you to imagine that whatever it is you do, whatever it is, I want you to imagine that as soon as you get to your desk or you get to your factory or you get to your station, there are 50 people screaming and spitting at your face. They’re screaming at you, spitting at you. They’re calling you names. They’re threatening you. I want you to imagine that every day you go to work, all day, you’ve got that. Now, I don’t care what kind of person you are. You could be the calmest person in the world. You’re going to snap at some point. You’re going to try to do something to get these people away from you because you’re doing your job. Now, because they flood the country with illegal aliens, now we have to get them out, which is obviously going to be an ugly job. Right. Very true. But because they’re taught these young people since kindergarten to go out and agitate, The left doesn’t care who gets killed. All they’re looking for is something to happen. It doesn’t matter what that something is. The ICE could hit them with a car. ICE could shoot them. ICE could beat them up. It doesn’t matter. The point is, once they get that footage, they know that that footage is going to be played and analyzed five billion different ways. And then they can spin it how you want. So what they’re doing, and obviously, Lennon calls them useful idiots. They are creating these useful idiots in the academia world, whether it’s K-12 or college. Obviously, then by the time they go out on the street, it doesn’t matter what happens to them. All they’re looking for is so that the left can come out and fake cry about them and then create that narrative. And so this is why it’s so important to get that indoctrination out of the academia, because if not, there’s going to be plenty of useful idiots for them to take advantage of.
SPEAKER 13 :
dumb question on my part. I don’t know if I’ve ever asked anybody this. I think you’re the person I probably could ask. Why does ICE not wear body cams?
SPEAKER 08 :
You know what? I don’t know. I don’t know why they don’t, because certainly police do, and possibly that’s not a protocol they have. Obviously, it would make sense that they do.
SPEAKER 13 :
I would think right now there, I mean, to me, if I were in charge, and I’m not, I would have them wearing them, because I think you’d save a lot of of grief and other things, because you’d have actual, you know, not only video, but audio recordings of these types of incidents that I think would, not that the left is always going to listen to you, I get how that works out, and they can spin anything, but I would think, personally, you’d have a lot less issues doing that than you would create issues.
SPEAKER 08 :
I couldn’t agree with you more, John, because, you know, a couple decades ago, the Black Lives, not that Black Lives Matter existed back then, but that type of organization screamed and screamed about police brutality. And then they actually pushed for webcam, and actually that was the worst thing that could happen to them. Right. Because the webcam shows that the 99.9% of police were justified in all their shootings.
SPEAKER 13 :
In fact, we’re extremely, extremely patient in the majority of what they were doing to the point where they finally were just like, okay, this is the tipping point. We’re not doing this anymore.
SPEAKER 08 :
Exactly. So the webcam actually worked in our favor. That’s right. And it worked against them. So I 100% agree with you. I actually don’t know why. I actually don’t know why that that isn’t a protocol for ICE agents when it’s now obviously a protocol for the officers. I mean, there’s a cost to it and all that stuff, but certainly, you know, I mean, we have enough money at the federal government.
SPEAKER 13 :
Oh, yeah, I was just going to say, like, that’s never stopped us from doing anything, Alvin.
SPEAKER 08 :
No, right. There’s no shortage of our tax dollars.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, I mean, when it comes to the federal government, there’s never been a we-can’t-afford-that statement ever made.
SPEAKER 08 :
Yeah. Right. It’s easy when you don’t have to make money.
SPEAKER 13 :
It’s not your money. It’s always easy to just let that happen. And I get it. I mean, not every police agency coast to coast. I get it. I mean, it’s budgetary and so on when it comes down to that end of things. But I think for a lot of your larger… cities and municipalities they’re starting to wear body cams now again to your point mainly not as a punishment to officers but really the opposite to show hey wait a minute this guy was a hundred percent or this this gal was a hundred percent you know police officer should say was a hundred percent justified in what happened in fact if anybody watches this video they may have done something far sooner than what they did they had the patient and i’ve watched them sometimes alvin it’s like these guys have the patience of job i wouldn’t put up with that crap near as long as they do
SPEAKER 08 :
Oh, I 100% agree. I’m actually shocked at how long of a fight they let go before they actually used the force. I agree. Because a fight like what they’re doing is so dangerous because, look, they’re not arresting people who are shoplift. No. They’re arresting serious monsters. That’s true. Gangbangers, people who would kill you without a second thought. That’s right. Good point. Or throw without a second thought. And so the fact that they’re going to arresting these people and then having to deal with all these agitators, And then kind of having a prolonged fight. You know, I’m actually shocked at how long they go on. Because the longer it goes on, the more dangerous it is for the agent.
SPEAKER 13 :
Good point. Good point. Alvin, always a joy talking to you. How do folks find you, sir?
SPEAKER 08 :
Oh, thank you so much. My organization is called Courage is a Habit. And we make tools and strategies for parents so that they can understand how to keep your kids from falling down this path of social justice activism and hating America. And it’s courageisahabit.org. That’s courageisahabit.org is where we have our entire catalog, and then our socials are at Courage Habit. We are a nonprofit, so every support you guys give us, certainly it helps so much. And coming on to your show, John, is always an honor and a privilege.
SPEAKER 13 :
I always enjoy it. I learn something every time you’re on, Alvin, and I appreciate all you’re doing. Thank you. You betcha, man. Have a great night. Again, Alvin Louie, it’s L-U-I, and courage is a habit. Al Smith up next. Great interview he did, Love Late. When it comes to your financial future, listen to this interview. Remember, you can always find Al on our website, klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 18 :
TJ here with KLZ Radio, and I’ve got Al Smith, Golden Eagle Finance, with us again. Al, how are you, sir? I’m great.
SPEAKER 17 :
How are you, TJ?
SPEAKER 18 :
I’m doing really well. I was just thinking today, you know, we’ve got a lot of changes and stuff coming in the financial world. The world is in turmoil in some ways, and I think people are probably a little concerned about risk. So how do you work with clients when they’re concerned about the market going up and down like that?
SPEAKER 17 :
Well, we usually have a pretty long conversation about how people are comfortable or not comfortable with market volatility. And that becomes one of the very initial parts of our conversation to help guide people to where they should place their money.
SPEAKER 18 :
What does that look like for you, Al, when you have that conversation? Is it a process you go through with everybody?
SPEAKER 17 :
Oh, absolutely. And the reason for that is because that’s a very large component of investment choices is the level of anticipated growth in exchange for the level of risk. If you wanted very low risk, there would be less likely to have high returns. And so it’s a kind of a trade-off.
SPEAKER 18 :
And are you able to build certain products or services or plans for folks that almost hedge against that volatility?
SPEAKER 17 :
I would say so. Often what we end up recommending is more than one product, more than one specific investment so that we can balance growth with safety.
SPEAKER 18 :
That sounds real good. It sounds like you go the full mile to customize solutions for folks based on what they need and their comfort. Al, how do people get in touch with you if they want to get an appointment with you?
SPEAKER 17 :
My office number is 303-744-1128. And if I’m not in, there’ll be someone else or voicemail and we respond to those voicemails quickly.
SPEAKER 18 :
Excellent. And as always, you can find Al Smith and Golden Eagle Financial on klzradio.com slash money. Al, thanks for joining us today.
SPEAKER 17 :
Well, thank you, TJ. You have a great day.
SPEAKER 07 :
This is Rush to Reason on KLZ 560.
SPEAKER 13 :
Okay, one thing to celebrate is it’s 520. I was just telling Charlie a moment ago, and the sun’s still up. Not a lot. It’s still light enough where you can see what you’re doing outside. And, wow, I sure enjoy when we start going this direction versus coming into winter where the days get shorter. The daylight days get shorter and shorter and shorter. I like where these days get longer. The daylight gets longer and longer and longer. Yeah, that is good. Really quick, back to Alvin, Louie and his organization. And I think it’s really important for a lot of you listening whereby you’re trying to figure out ways to keep your own kids, your own family on track when it comes to a lot of things that we’re talking about. Because Alvin’s right, a lot of these individuals that get involved in these, you know, not only protests, but just, you know, the whole anti-American theme that’s coming from schools, colleges, schools. high schools, elementary school, and so on. And reality is you’ve got to know how to fight back against that, or it’s going to be a constant challenge that you have. And so organizations like Alvin’s really do help at the end of the day. So I encourage you to really follow him and listen to all this and follow him and support him, by the way, if you can. Joe, you’re next. Go ahead, sir.
SPEAKER 04 :
John, just a couple of things on the shooting in Minnesota of that nurse. And also, I don’t know if you read the statement by the Arizona Attorney General telling people they have a legal right to shoot ICE agents if they break into their house.
SPEAKER 13 :
Did you see that? Yeah, I did see that, which that’s really bad advice.
SPEAKER 04 :
But here’s my point, both with her advice and this guy bringing it in. By the way, the gun he brought was a Sig 320, which is the official sidearm of the U.S. military. It’s a huge gun. The magazine holds 20 rounds, and so he had two spares. So he had, and by the way, that is not a concealed carry gun, John, it’s a monster of a gun. And, you know, and why do you need 60 rounds of ammunition?
SPEAKER 12 :
To go to a protest.
SPEAKER 04 :
Well, first of all, you know this, they tell you when you’re in training, when you’re carrying a concealed weapon, the only person who should know that you’re carrying a concealed weapon is you. Nobody else should know that you’re carrying a concealed weapon. Now, Did he have a right to carry that gun? Yes. But, you know, knowledge is knowing what you can do.
SPEAKER 13 :
Thank you, Joe, for saying, because there’s even a big, not conspiracy, a big conglomerate, a conglomeration, I should say, of individuals on our side that are like, listen, you know, we’ll support this guy. He had the ability to carry this, that, and the other. And by the way, Joe, I’ll never take that away. From individuals, you know me, I’ve been a gun owner since, good night. I mean, I started shooting when I was, I’m not exaggerating, when I was five, six years of age. I had been shooting, you know, and I’d been a gun owner literally my entire life, Joe, not just my adult life, but darn near my entire life if you think about that age. But with all of that being said, Joe, one thing I think my dad, you know, taught all of us kids, my brother and I especially, is, you know, owning a gun and having a gun is a huge responsibility. Think carefully about what you’re doing.
SPEAKER 04 :
Exactly. And my point, John, is that knowing what you can do and knowing what you should do, knowing what you can do is knowledge. Knowing what you should do is wisdom. And, yes, if somebody breaks down, if five guys with rifles and ballistic vests break down your front door and don’t announce themselves, do you have the legal right to shoot? Yes, you do. But you also have to realize sometime in the next two minutes you’re going to be dead. There’s no two ways around it. Yeah, do you have the legal right to shoot at them? Absolutely you do. Will you be dead in the next two minutes? Yes, 100%. If five guys in ballistic vests, by the way, if you’re shooting at them with a handgun, unless you can pull off a headshot on a moving target and get all five guys, you’re going to be dead in the next two minutes. So should you, even though you can, should you? No, because that would be stupid and that would not be wise. The same thing, you don’t go to a protest… with a large capacity gun and display it, that is not wisdom, John. Maybe you have the legal right to do it, but it’s stupid. Are you trying to provoke something? You know the old saying, play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and again, I’m going to support everybody’s right to keep and bear arms, Joe, always will. Now, what one person might do with a firearm versus what you or I might do with a firearm could be two completely different things. It doesn’t take away their right to have it, but man alive, Joe, you’ve got to have common sense at some point.
SPEAKER 04 :
Again, that’s where the wisdom part comes in. So just because the law says you can, you know, there’s a lot of things the law says I can do, John, but, you know, I don’t because it’s not smart.
SPEAKER 13 :
It’s just not smart at the end of the day. And it’s just, you know, there are times, Joe, where those particular battles, maybe that’s the way to say it, those are battles not worth fighting.
SPEAKER 04 :
Right. And, John, you know, as a pilot, we have this something called risk analysis. And when you look at a flight, you know, you say, okay, what are the risk factors? Okay, is there one, you know, are there no risk factors? Are there one risk factor? Are there two? In fact, I helped develop, John, an app for pilots. I belong to an aircraft owners group. And I helped develop a quick 10-question thing, and then you score it. And it’s a, we call it the flight risk assessment tool. And you basically answer yes, no to each of these 10. And, John, it takes less than 60 seconds. You plan your flight, then you pull up this little 10 questions on your phone. And you answer yes, no, yes, no, yes, no, no. And it scores the flight. And it tells you, for instance, okay, if your score is less than 300, this is a low-risk flight. Between 300 and 600, this is a medium-risk flight. If it’s above 600, this is a low-risk flight.
SPEAKER 13 :
I’m assuming a lot of it has to do with time and pressure and weather and all sorts of things.
SPEAKER 04 :
Right. Your proficiency, when was the last time you executed an instrument approach? What’s the weather like at your destination? What’s the weather like en route? How much sleep have you had, et cetera, et cetera? So it comes down to risk assessment, and these people, when they bring a big gun with 60 rounds of ammunition to a protest where there’s armed federal law enforcement officers, your risk assessment is going through the roof.
SPEAKER 13 :
Right.
SPEAKER 04 :
Good point. And again, so that’s the difference, Don, between can and should, because just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and as I said earlier, Joe, watching some of the videos, there’s not that many out there. I’ve only seen a couple, and they’re lame at best. I mean, they’re not good video. There’s tons of movement where they’re away from the particular altercation that’s happening. It’s hard to tell exactly what’s going on, who’s doing what. I mean, they’re awful video. I mean, anybody’s going to use those videos for any kind of indictment on down the road, Joe. I don’t know how you could. I mean, they’re absolutely awful. Meaning now you’ve got to rely on eyewitness accounts, and in this case, the authorities that were there and what they saw happening, and that’s who you’re going to have to rely on.
SPEAKER 04 :
It is. And by the way, the left, of course, is already producing these outrageous claims like, well, he was shot in the back ten times. Well, John, I haven’t seen a coroner’s report, and you certainly can’t get that from any of the videos you’ve seen. But no, they are stating as an established fact, That they shot him in the back 10 times. Now, John, they’re just provoking.
SPEAKER 12 :
That’s it.
SPEAKER 04 :
That’s right. John, they know what they’re doing. They want more of their followers to get killed.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s right. That’s exactly. Well, as I said earlier, Joe, and I say this all the time, they don’t care about their own.
SPEAKER 04 :
No. They’re trying to spin up the rage machine. That’s their stock and trade, John, is feeding the rage machine.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s right.
SPEAKER 1 :
100%.
SPEAKER 04 :
And they’ll make any outrageous claim they can. And, of course, nobody can prove them wrong. Well, he was shot in the back 10 times. Can I prove that he wasn’t shot in the back 10 times? Not until the coroner’s report comes out. But in the meantime, John, they have fueled the rage machine. They’ve got other people. I never owned a gun before, but I’m going to go out and buy one. Those sons of bitches. Right, right, right.
SPEAKER 12 :
That’s right.
SPEAKER 04 :
They are feeding the fire. They’re throwing gasoline on the fire, and they know damn well what they’re doing. Exactly right. And they really hope that more people… Die. More people die.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s exactly what they’re hoping for, Joey. I believe that wholeheartedly, and as I said many, many, many times, they don’t care about people, especially their own.
SPEAKER 04 :
Right. If anybody wants to see some of this outrageous propaganda that is pandering to them, there’s a Facebook page called Being Liberal. It’s one of the oldest, and it’s got like a million followers. Just go on that, John, and your jaw will drop. If any of your listeners, again, it’s a Facebook site called Being Liberal. And the amount of outrageous stuff they post to incite violence on the part of their followers is just completely unbelievable.
SPEAKER 13 :
Interesting.
SPEAKER 04 :
And I just hope that people on the left—I know there’s some very far-right sites out there, too, that do similar things. But, you know, don’t fall into the trap. Don’t be a puppet. What was the word? Useful idiots?
SPEAKER 13 :
Yep. Don’t be one of those.
SPEAKER 04 :
that Stalin and Karl Marx. Don’t be a useful idiot.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s right. Well said. Joe, I’ll leave it at that. Always good. Appreciate you very much. We’ll take a timeout. Brad and Lakewood, hang tight. We’ll come right back to you. Roof Savers of Colorado coming up next. And you can save money, by the way, on your insurance in a lot of cases with the Roof Max treatment. Any problems with your roof, of course, Dave can help you with that. And if you’ve had any damage at all from previous storms and you might need a replacement, Dave can help you with that. All your roofing needs under one roof. 303- 710-6916.
SPEAKER 16 :
More and more homeowners are getting letters from insurance companies, canceling policies, or reducing coverage over aging roofs. And heading into winter, that’s the last thing you need. Roof Savers of Colorado can help. Roof Savers can apply RoofMax, a bio-friendly treatment that restores your shingle’s flexibility and extends roof life up to 15 more years, helping you meet insurance requirements without a full replacement. And it comes with a full five-year warranty, giving you peace of mind. And if a RoofMax treatment doesn’t make sense for your roof, we can replace it quickly and professionally before the snow piles up. Call 303-710-6916 or visit RoofSaverCO.com for your free roof assessment. KLZ listeners receive $250 off their treatment. Call today and receive an additional $150 off your RoofMax treatment through the end of December. Roof Savers of Colorado, protecting your roof, your home, and your insurance coverage all winter long.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, as I talked about in the 3 o’clock hour, brand new sponsor of ours right now, Plumberoos. If you’re looking for a great plumber, look no further than Mike Jansen. He is the owner of, and they do things differently than most plumbing companies do. So whatever you need when it comes to plumbing, 720-219-3908. Also find them at klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 16 :
Plumberoos is your local trustworthy plumber like you used to have when they were your plumber. When you invite someone into your home, trust matters. And that’s why Mike Jansen built Plumberoos differently. Mike is a master plumber raised in Colorado, and every job he does reflects his values. Honesty, respect, and real solutions. The team of plumbers and technicians are paid hourly, not on commission, so you’ll never be talked into work you don’t need. No matter the need, Plumberoo’s gives you clear options and lets you decide what the next step is without a sales pitch or add-ons. Unlike those big national companies, Mike and Plumberoo’s appreciate the value of providing service to their local community where they live and work, which in turn keeps your money here in Colorado. When you need a licensed and insured local company who can be your plumber, call Plumberoos by finding them on the klzradio.com advertisers page.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, any legal needs, we got you covered. Civil, criminal, you name it, flesh law is there for you. 303-806-8886.
SPEAKER 15 :
Here’s why you need personal injury attorney Kevin Flesch on your side. He understands the way the jury thinks. In the context of a personal injury case, you’ve been hurt by someone else’s negligence. The idea is that you’re going to try to recover so that you can get back to where you were just prior to that incident occurring. What that really means from a jurist’s perspective is that you’re going to be asking them to award you money. So when we talk about fairness, we’re talking about six people that you don’t know. Those six people view the evidence and make a unanimous decision that will decide what the fair value is. When you’re the one who’s hurt, you have a good idea of what you think it’s worth. The question is, can you persuade those other individuals whom you don’t know and were witnesses to believe that’s what the case is worth? Kevin Flesch understands the way the jury thinks. Call now for a free consultation. 303-806-8886.
SPEAKER 06 :
The best export we have is common sense. You’re listening to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, we are back. Welcome back. Rush to Reason, Debra’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. Brad Lakewood, you’re next. Go ahead.
SPEAKER 10 :
Yeah, I see once again the Republicans find a way to grab… victory from the job or grab defeat for a judge of victory fifty seven republicans voted to keep the kill switches in the car now as much uh… sales rep of the dealer told me that can create a lot of problems because of that computer decides you’re driving unsafe in a major traffic jam if you either cause an accident or at the very least a traffic jam now
SPEAKER 13 :
By the way, he’s extremely, extremely wrong in the information that he gave you, because that’s not at all how that device will work, or the devices, I should say, plural, and each manufacturer will probably do things a little bit differently. But no, Brad, he is 100% wrong in what he just said in that regard. I’m not saying that I’m in favor of them, but he’s wrong in his description to you as to how they work.
SPEAKER 10 :
Well, say you’re a, what determines unsafe driving? Because say you’re a, Going 90 to 65 out in eastern Colorado where I’ve seen people do it.
SPEAKER 13 :
No, it’s not going to be speed related or anything along those lines. It’s going to be looking, it’s going to be tracking eye movement, pupil dilation, movement on the steering wheel, things along those lines. It’s not going to have much, because frankly, here’s the reality. Majority of drunk people drive under. the speed limit not over the speed limit because they’re impaired they really don’t know how fast they’re driving very very few drunks i’m not saying it doesn’t happen because drunks can drive fast but typically it’s not that they’re driving too fast it’s that they drive erratically they get into the other lane they have head-ons and so on and that’s what that particular device or that that technology will be looking for well what if it decides it wants to shut down in a major traffic jam wouldn’t that cause some sort of problem Well, again, typically speaking, again, there’s always exceptions to this, but typically speaking, most people aren’t drunk in a traffic jam. They’re drunk at other times, usually late at night, sometimes early in the morning, coming away from the bars, things along those lines. Not saying that drunks can’t happen at any time of the day, but the majority of are typically those that happen either late at night or early morning. Rarely do you ever see somebody drunk in rush hour traffic, Brad. And I don’t know all the technicalities as to how they will advise you that the vehicle is going to be shutting down. I am guessing, I’m guessing because I don’t know this for sure, that they’ll have some sort of a warning device that will tell you, hey, hey, bud, you know, wake up or, you know, you’re going to get shut down, blah, blah, blah. I guarantee you there’ll be some sort of a warning that is instituted on the front side. It will not just automatically shut the car off like this guy said. He’s wrong.
SPEAKER 10 :
Well, then when the car shuts down, then what happens? It shuts down in, say, eastern Colorado. Do you have to call AAA, or how long does the car stay shut down?
SPEAKER 13 :
That I don’t know. And by the way, I’m not sure that even all of… Well, I can tell you this. I don’t think all of that technology has been figured out yet, Brad. The way that legislation was written, and I read it back when it was happening in the transportation bill that Biden put through. I read all of that. It really is pretty vague on all of that, and I’m guessing that a lot of that will still have to be worked out with the manufacturers as to how exactly they’ll make that technology work, because… I don’t think that’s all completely been fully developed yet. So, again, why there’s any salesperson telling you exactly how it’s going to work when it hasn’t even been developed yet is beyond me. That guy’s a knucklehead.
SPEAKER 10 :
Okay, and so misleading information doesn’t help, but to me, it’s just another computer to drive up the price of cars because… That’s one of the reasons cars are so expensive nowadays is you’ve got all that computer crap.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and again, not defending. I’m just being honest as far as my end of it on the car, you know, automotive end of things goes. It won’t because that technology is already there. The majority of cars that are out there, Brad, have exactly what’s needed. It’s going to be software updates more than anything to get the information they need. The majority of cars being sold already have what’s there to find what they need for this. So, again, that’s another one of those where it’s, It’s probably a little bit more propagandish on, hey, this is going to do X, Y, Z. And unfortunately, there’s a lot of non-car people that push that stuff out there, push that narrative out there. And unfortunately, they’re wrong.
SPEAKER 10 :
Well, I still don’t like it.
SPEAKER 13 :
I don’t like it either. I mean, to me, it’s an invasion of your privacy and what you want to do and so on. So I’m not for it. But I also know that this is where our side struggles some, you know, to your point even about winning and losing and so on. Our side at times doesn’t even know all of the ins and outs of what I just said. So we repeat a bunch of stuff that we don’t even know is true. And then we look really dumb at the end of the day.
SPEAKER 10 :
And personally, I wish I could get those LED lights out of cars because I have a Mazda 3 and – It has a poor headlight design, so what happens is during a snowstorm, the snow gets trapped in the headlights, and there’s no way to melt it. You can’t see.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s right. And that’s another one, right? Yeah, I mean, that’s one where, again, I don’t have any insight into what the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is going to do when it comes to approving and disapproving certain things along those lines, lighting included. And for some people, myself included, some of those really bright LEDs, yeah, they’re tough to drive against, no doubt about it.
SPEAKER 10 :
Yeah, and I brought it back to the Mazda dealer and told them about that, and they acted like I was wasting their time. I wrote the National Highway Traffic Safety Board, and I also wrote Mazda, and you get these letters back, sorry to hear about that, and that’s the last you hear about them. So it’s like they don’t even care.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and the whole – I had some emails and stuff over the weekend, some of the folks asking me about the kill switch, they call it. And my answer back was, well, this isn’t new. I guess some of this is being regurgitated on social media now, Brad, because reality is it’s been around. It’s been in that bill for quite some time. Now, I’m with you. Why we’ve got certain – I can already tell you why. I mean, I’ll give you the answer as to why certain Republicans have voted for this. It’s because they’ve got some of the advocate groups like MAD and others in their back pocket that are probably donating to their campaigns and so on, and that’s why they’re voting for this stuff.
SPEAKER 10 :
I see. Now, getting under other subjects, why is Greg Lopez deciding to run as an independent?
SPEAKER 13 :
Because he’s a moron.
SPEAKER 10 :
We finally have somewhat of a chance.
SPEAKER 13 :
I just said, you know, I’m sorry, Brad, I just said he was a moron, and I mean that, and I like Greg, but the dumbest decision he could have ever made. I think he had a pretty good chance of continuing on with his campaign being inside of the Republican Party. party, he now has zero chance, and I mean absolutely zero chance, of winning anything along those lines. And really, Brad, and I said this the other day, he’s ruined his political career in Colorado now. He’s done. This is over for Greg. He’s stupid on his part.
SPEAKER 10 :
And when it comes to some of Trump’s endorsements, I’ve been following Valentina Gomez down in Texas, and she approached John Carter and tried to ask him a few questions, and he’s 84 years old, he can’t even talk, yet Trump endorses him And then Valentina Gomez says she got charged with criminal trespass for asking John Carter a few tough questions.
SPEAKER 13 :
Yeah, and that’s inside baseball that, Brad, even I don’t have answers to when it comes to why does Trump do some of the things he does. I mean, personally, and I get it, a lot of presidents get involved in these things. They try to help with campaigns and so on. I really wish that he would be like me and not endorse anyone, because I never do. I just don’t feel like it’s my place to do so. I know other radio hosts do. I’m not one of those that does, and I wish he wouldn’t.
SPEAKER 10 :
Now, why is Trump pulling Bovino out of Minneapolis? I was watching Bannon earlier today, and Bannon was on the warpath about that, and he says Trump’s starting to cave to waltz, or implied that.
SPEAKER 13 :
Oh, I highly doubt he’s caving to Walsh. If anything, I think it’s the other way around. I would say that Walsh is caving to Trump at this point. And unfortunately for for any Republican in Minnesota, it’s like Colorado, Brad. It would take a really, really outstanding Republican candidate to try to win that state and take that away from the Democrats, just like here in Colorado. It’s not going to say, you know, never say never, but it’s almost an impossibility.
SPEAKER 10 :
Do you think Lindell even has a chance?
SPEAKER 13 :
No, no. He, of all people, has zero chance. None. None.
SPEAKER 10 :
And do you think he’ll get the nomination?
SPEAKER 13 :
He might, and that would be the stupidest thing we could ever do because he doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of winning. And I like Mike. He’s a great guy. But, no, he has no chance of winning. None.
SPEAKER 10 :
And why did a bunch of Republicans the other day vote to give $5 billion for migrant resettlement? Only 24 Republicans voted no to that. Are these Republicans trying to throw the House on purpose? I know you and I have discussed that before.
SPEAKER 13 :
No, it’s kickback money. I mean, this is just like any other thing these guys vote for. If these things are in their districts and there’s money flowing into those districts, they’re going to vote for it. It’s what they do.
SPEAKER 10 :
So it’s like follow the money.
SPEAKER 12 :
Yeah, it’s exactly what it is.
SPEAKER 10 :
It’s sort of like when you watch the rodeo nowadays, a lot of the bull riders are wearing helmets. Is it really for safety reasons, or is it because the people that make helmets for a living are pushing this so they can make more money off the rodeo.
SPEAKER 13 :
It’s probably both. Both. I mean, there’s probably some safety advantage to it that some of the old hardcore guys won’t wear those, but it’s more for the safety end of things, I would say. I don’t know that it’s the helmet companies actually making a boatload of money, but they do, and all these companies push for those sorts of things. It’s like, you know, it’s like, Brad, when we were kids, you know, nobody ever wore a bike helmet. You didn’t even know what one was, and now everybody has to wear a bike helmet even if you’re on a moped.
SPEAKER 10 :
And I see a lot of grown adults wearing them. bicycle helmets too. I mean, I’m not a fan of helmets even on my motorcycle, but If somebody wants to wear one, I guess… Yeah, I’m not going to stop them, but I’m like you.
SPEAKER 13 :
It’s like, okay, I grew up not wearing one. If I want to wear one, I will. If I don’t, I won’t. But at the end of the day, I don’t want to be forced to. And if you want to wear one, more power to you. But, I mean, somehow or another, I mean, I was talking to somebody, a good friend of mine today about this, Brad. Reality is, I mean, you and I grew up, there wasn’t a car seat one ever found, and somehow we survived. I mean, and it’s not that I’m against car seats, but, man alive, we make things so safe anymore that there’s no risk.
SPEAKER 10 :
I know, because when we were little kids back in the 50s, I was… We’d sit in the back of my folk station wagon and none of us wore safety belts. Nope.
SPEAKER 13 :
Nope. Not a one. Again, a friend of mine I was talking to today, you know, my sister was born, you know, not long after she was born. I remember my mom, you know, making me hang on to her across the bench seat because I was five and I was in the front seat. And, you know, I’d get buckled in and I would make sure my sister didn’t roll off because car seats didn’t exist at that time, Brad. And I was the car seat, essentially. That’s what we did.
SPEAKER 10 :
Are you even allowed to ride in the back of a pickup truck anymore? I don’t think so.
SPEAKER 13 :
No, I still see it occasionally and just wonder, okay, who’s getting the ticket? Because I don’t think you can, no, not legally.
SPEAKER 10 :
Because when we were little kids, that was a big deal. Oh, yeah. Oh, absolutely.
SPEAKER 13 :
Sit on the edge or sit on the wheel well or whatever. Oh, yeah, that was a big deal when we were kids to do that. And we’ve sanitized everything to the point, Brad, anymore. And this goes back to, you know, your conversation about, you know, why are Republicans voting for this particular kill switch? Because we’ve become so sanitized and so, quote, unquote, safe that we’re trying to make everything risk-free. And the reality is that’s not life.
SPEAKER 10 :
So the kill switch isn’t as bad as
SPEAKER 13 :
people are making out it’s not as bad as people are making it out to be i’m still not a fan of it i don’t like it at all because i still think it’s an you know it’s an infringement upon you know your privacy if you would but again at the end of the day we have laws about what you can do on the roads and not do on the roads and i do i am one that believes that driving is a privilege i don’t think driving is a right and so you know states feds whatever they can make laws you know surrounding you know even the type of equipment that we put on the roads and Now, I didn’t agree with this when it came out. I think it was stupid back in the day, and I think they should kill the kill switch. But again, when you’ve got people that are probably getting money in from the likes of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, which I’m not a fan of either. People are going to be shocked at that. No, I’m not a fan of them. I think Mothers Against Drunk Driving are very militant in what they do, and they’re not always right.
SPEAKER 10 :
Yeah, I agree with that.
SPEAKER 13 :
And I’m not for drunk driving either, Brad. I mean, you guys all know me. I’m the first one to say, you know, don’t drive drunk. I’m not going to advocate that ever. But I do know that those organizations, like MAD, they are very militant.
SPEAKER 10 :
And I don’t like airbags in cars either. I wish those weren’t in there as well.
SPEAKER 13 :
Well, what I wish is we had total free market, and if you wanted to buy a car completely safe that wrapped you in a cushion when you have a wreck, then more power to you, you can buy that. If you want to go like you’re talking and not have any of those devices, you should be able to buy that as well. I think you should be able to buy whatever you want to. I don’t think it should be mandated.
SPEAKER 10 :
I agree. Now, I notice they don’t make sticks like they used to, but personally I think sticks last longer and they’re cheaper to repair. And, yeah, a lot of people don’t drive them anymore, but a lot of people still like them Do you think the car companies are trying to eliminate sticks altogether?
SPEAKER 13 :
Well, and that’s simply a numbers game when it comes to manufacturers. Brad, the reality is the majority of people would rather have an automatic than a manual transmission. That has nothing to do with the manufacturers and wanting to save money, not save money, make money, not make money. It’s simply a numbers game. When they continue to see the offerings of manual transmissions diminish to where it’s like 3% or 4% now of buyers will even buy one, yeah, they’re just not going to make them.
SPEAKER 10 :
Personally, I think sticks are better.
SPEAKER 13 :
Oh, I love them. I mean, I’m with you, but it’s a numbers game for the manufacturer on that side.
SPEAKER 10 :
So the last time we talked, we were talking about, do the Republicans have much of a chance in 2025 to hold the House? Has your opinion changed since the last time we talked?
SPEAKER 13 :
So if the economy, and I talked about this opening the show up today after going to the auction this last week, and if the economy does what I think it’s going to do and we can get housing back on track, which it’s getting better even as we speak, yeah, I think we’ve got a pretty good chance, Brad. To me, this is going to come down to the economy.
SPEAKER 10 :
what about Elon’s money getting involved? That’ll help, too.
SPEAKER 13 :
Well, funding never hurts, Brad, but at the end of the day, I still think it comes down to just if the economy’s doing well, people will forget about some of the other stuff with Trump. Right now, the affordability thing is big, and we need to get things more affordable, and prices don’t ever come down, but you can sure make things more manageable when it comes to mortgages and things like that, even buying a car.
SPEAKER 10 :
We have to find a better way to communicate our messages.
SPEAKER 13 :
Absolutely we do, Brad, absolutely. You know my feeling on that one.
SPEAKER 10 :
Because even with tax cuts and the price of gas going down, people are still complaining about Trump.
SPEAKER 13 :
That’s right.
SPEAKER 10 :
That’s right.
SPEAKER 13 :
Because the narrative they hear every night on the news is he’s bad.
SPEAKER 10 :
So that’s about all I have for today.
SPEAKER 13 :
You’re awesome, Brad. As always, I enjoy talking to you. You make me think, and I appreciate that greatly. Cub Creek Heating and Air Conditioning coming up next. Make sure you’re dialed in when it comes to your furnace. Go to Cub Creek today. Find them at klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 05 :
Cub Creek Heating and AC can help you cover the cost of replacing your furnace to meet the new low nitrogen oxide regulations. With any new regulations comes incentives, rebates, and programs that can save you real money if you understand them. These rebates change this year and Cub Creek Heating and AC stay current on every update so you don’t have to. Hunter and his team know how to stack state programs, rebates, and incentives in the most beneficial way for you, sometimes covering a significant portion of the furnace cost so you’re not left in the cold and broke this winter. If your furnace is more than 10 years old, call our Rheem-certified pro partners, Cub Creek Heating and AC, now. They’ll shoot straight with you and partner with you to find the right solution for your home and your budget. Mention this ad on KLZ and you’ll get a free one-year maintenance agreement, a $350 value when you purchase a new furnace. Find Cub Creek Heating and AC at klzradio.com slash HVAC.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, we want a great doctor that thinks like we do, that wants your best health for you. In other words, wants you to live the best life possible. That’s Dr. Scott, 303-663-6990.
SPEAKER 02 :
What if you could get over 110 lab biomarkers tested just like Dr. Mark Hyman advertises, but for a fraction of the cost and with a doctor who actually explains the results? At Castle Rock Regenerative Health, Dr. Scott Faulkner has recreated this powerful biomarker test panel at a substantial savings. We have a special price for both men and women. Just $689. That’s a savings of over $2,500 over the standard price. And here’s the difference. With Hyman, you get numbers on a page. With Castle Rock Regenerative Health, you get Dr. Faulkner and his team walking you through every result, showing what’s off and creating a personalized plan to fix it. What’s even better, you don’t even have to be a concierge patient to get this pricing. This is open to everyone. Think about it. Most people’s deductible is higher than this special price. And your regular doctor, if he could get approved by your insurance, would never order this many tests, let alone know what to do with them. Call 303-663-6990 today or visit CastleRockRegenerativeHealth.com. That’s 303-669-6990. Take control of your health at Castle Rock Regenerative Health.
SPEAKER 01 :
The good news for seniors on Medicare is that you have more options today than ever before. The challenge is that all of these new options can be very confusing and making the wrong choice can cost you thousands of dollars more out of your pocket. Call Paul Leningro at GIA Insurance and his team of Medicare specialists will help you find the right plan for your needs. Call 303-423-0162, extension 100, or go online to e-gia.com.
SPEAKER 07 :
This isn’t Rage Radio. This is Real Relatable Radio. Back to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, we are back. Thank you for listening. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. Okay, this is an article that I was going to try to spend a little bit more time on because I figured some folks might call in. So I might actually bring this back tomorrow with Andy and I. But Southwest Airlines, which you all know is kind of my airline of choice. I fly them. There’s no denying that. And big changes coming for them tomorrow. I think it’s tomorrow. First day where it’s assigned seating because in the past it’s been open seating and you’ve always had the, you know, boarding sections. So, you know, A1 through 15 and then 16 through 30 and you get the drift. And it was open seat. You went and picked your seat, which I’ve always enjoyed because I get to sit wherever I want to. And I’m an aisle guy. I don’t sit anywhere else. I don’t sit in the middle, won’t sit on the window. Because sometimes you have to use the restroom and I don’t want to climb over anybody. And I just want the freedom of being in the aisle. I don’t care about looking out the window. I could care less. I’ve seen enough out the window of an airplane. I don’t need to see anymore. I’m in the aisle. So all that being said, they used to have, Southwest had this policy whereby if you’re a plus-sized individual, in other words, you couldn’t fit in one seat, you spilled over if you would, You could actually buy a second seat, but then after proving that you’re a person of size, you could get a refund on that second seat, which to me, to be honest with you, I thought was a bunch of garbage. And just one of the things about Southwest I didn’t like because if you’re a person of size – and I can say this. I can say this probably better than most talk show hosts can because I was one of those. I’m not now, but I once was. I weighed over 300 pounds. I know what it’s like to be a person of size fitting into a seat. So I get that. And I would have never in my entire life expected somebody else to buy me a seat because I needed to. I wouldn’t have expected the airline to buy me a second seat. I wouldn’t have expected the passengers to get hit with an extra charge because somebody like me is getting a free seat. So I feel like I can talk about this probably better than most because I was that person. And I’m not being rude to anybody that’s of size. But if you’re of size, that’s of your doing. When we all come out of the womb, you’re not obese. So this whole idea of, well, it’s just in my genes. Well, it may be, but you can fix it. I have. I know, folks. I know how this works. You can fix it. It’s a choice. It really is. It’s a choice at the end of the day. It’s a choice of whether you want to be that way or not. So for me, given the fact that it’s a choice, why should I have to subsidize your airfare? I shouldn’t. So I guess Southwest must have listened to some folks like myself because they’ve now canceled that plus size policy. So now, this starts tomorrow, Tuesday, if you want two seats, you have to pay for two. You’re no longer going to get a free seat if you fly Southwest and you’re a plus size individual. Now, again, some of you may be wrong. You might be mad at me for saying this, but my feeling is if you can’t sit behind between the armrests on your own and you need a secondary seat, then you should be paying for that. You should not be getting that seat for free. I’m sorry. I don’t get two seats for free. Why should you? And I’m tired of folks that are in a quote-unquote, handicap’s not even the right word, but you put yourself in a position where you need more help than someone else, that’s on you, not the rest of society. Why should the rest of society be paying for you and your decisions? That’s no different than somebody that decides to be homeless or they want to be a drug addict or they want to be an alcoholic or whatever. I mean, at the end of the day, why should I, and any of you listening, be subsidizing those individuals on any level? You shouldn’t be. You shouldn’t be. Now, I get it. We subsidize a lot of folks through health care and other things, and this is a deep topic and I could talk for hours on. I’m just simply stating what Southwest is now doing because they’re getting rid of their policy whereby at one time you could get two seats for the price of one if you’re an oversized person. This is going to make some mad, I’m sure, but I don’t think any other airlines give you two seats if you’re an oversized person either. So at the end of the day, you’re going to buy two seats no matter what. And with Southwest, there’s no exception. Now, I think tomorrow’s a great day with Southwest because I’ve hated the pre-borders and what that’s done. And the pre-borders are what caused them to do assigned seating. And some of you listening know exactly what I’m talking about. It’s because of pre-boarders and the plethora of that Southwest now finally went to assigned seating, which I don’t think is going to be to their benefit, but they didn’t have any other way to get rid of the pre-board nonsense they had going on. So they were forced into doing this because of all the freeloaders that were out there that would use the pre-boarding sides of things. And that’s what Southwest ended up doing to cure that. That’s my opinion, my opinion only. I don’t know that from any inside info at Southwest, but that’s my thought process. Veteran Windows and Doors coming up next. Again, make sure you’re dialed in when it comes to your windows and doors. Save money, by the way, by cutting out that middleman. Talk to Dave today. Find him at klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 14 :
You want windows for your home that will truly last. That’s why we trust our exclusive partner, Veteran Windows and Doors. As a Provia Platinum dealer, Veteran offers unique, customizable window options you simply won’t find anywhere else. For example, they now offer several new laminate window options that are built to last and virtually maintenance-free. So once they’re installed, there’s nothing left to think about. This kind of reliability is rare in the window industry. All Provia windows are designed and manufactured right here in the U.S. with quality and precision. And through Veterans Provia Platinum Partnership, you also get access to four new window series featuring classic wood grain finishes with a remarkably realistic look, giving you more flexibility to match the style of your home. Enjoy peace of mind knowing your windows will stay beautiful and energy efficient for years to come. For top-of-the-line windows you can trust, contact Veteran Windows and Doors by going to klzradio.com today.
SPEAKER 07 :
Suck it up, Buttercup. Back to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 13 :
All right, we are back. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. Finishing things up today. Appreciate you all listening. Thanks for all the text messages as well, by the way. I appreciate it. Most of them very informative. Sometimes you guys send me things as much as I put out to you all, and I appreciate that greatly. And as I always say, if there’s a text message I don’t respond to, I’ve read it, and thank you for sending it. I do my best to respond to every one of those the best I can, but I can’t get to all of them at all times. Myself and Andy will be back tomorrow. Have a great night. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560.
SPEAKER 1 :
Thank you.
