In this episode of Rush to Reason, John Rush and Andy Pate delve into the political dynamics of Greg Lopez’s candidacy in Colorado. They discuss Greg’s strategies and question his ability to attract votes across the political spectrum. As they explore the implications of his policies, including stances on abortion, climate change, and low-income housing, they highlight the potential consequences for the Republican party in the state.
SPEAKER 04 :
This is Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 13 :
You are going to shut your damn yapper and listen for a change because I got you pegged, sweetheart. You want to take the easy way out because you’re scared. And you’re scared because if you try and fail, there’s only you to blame. Let me break this down for you. Life is scary. Get used to it. There are no magical fixes.
SPEAKER 04 :
With your host, John Rush.
SPEAKER 11 :
My advice to you is to do what your parents did.
SPEAKER 13 :
Get a job first. You haven’t made everybody equal. You’ve made them the same, and there’s a big difference.
SPEAKER 01 :
Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there. It is this feeling that has brought you to me.
SPEAKER 04 :
Are you crazy? Am I? Or am I so sane that you just blew your mind?
SPEAKER 05 :
It’s Rush to Reason with your host, John Rush. Presented by Cub Creek Heating and Air Conditioning.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay, we are back. Hour number two, Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. Myself, Andy Pate, Charlie Grimes, of course. And again, welcome to hour number two.
SPEAKER 06 :
We are here. We’re here. Yeah. Here, here. We’re here. We’re here. Can we talk about Greg Lopez? Go right ahead. Let’s do it. And by the way, I just want to say I really enjoyed your interview with him yesterday. I got to listen to the pod of it. I wasn’t able to at the time. Good job, as we expected, of course. But I also was really happy that you treated him so well. Because it would have been easy to go after a guy like that. And I thought you were tough, but very fair.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay, thank you. And that’s what I wanted to be. Because he’s a good guy. We both like him. Thank you. I have nothing against anybody. It’s simply politics. And I disagree with the way that he is looking at politics in Colorado and the direction that he’s headed. Because as I said yesterday, he’ll end up being the Ross Perot of Colorado. He’ll do nothing but take away from the Republicans when it’s all said and done. And we have very little chance of winning here in Colorado anyways. We have no chance now.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, let me speak first to… Am I saying that all correctly? Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
Thank you.
SPEAKER 1 :
100%.
SPEAKER 03 :
Thank you.
SPEAKER 06 :
Let me speak first to the idea that he’s going to draw entirely from the right because he is. For those who are out there right now, if you like Greg or if you’re thinking about Greg, once again, I like Greg as a person. Always have, always will. This is simply talking about numbers and about politics. I’m being honest. It’s just data. It’s just data. Yeah, it’s just data. Greg is going to draw entirely from the right, okay? And let me give you the reasons again. Number one, more options is always best for the left than the right. Okay, why? On the right, the Republicans are the party of individualists. Democrats are the party of collectivists. Individualists scatter when there are more options. Collectivists continue to collect. into one place they are going to group together they’re going to they’re going to herd together as cows and they’re still going to vote for their people let me give it a quick example of this colorado colorado the number of unaffiliated voters in colorado has been rising rising rising right It is now over half the state voters, I believe. And you would think, oh, well, then both parties can draw equally from those unaffiliated voters. Is that how it goes?
SPEAKER 03 :
No.
SPEAKER 06 :
No, not even close. What has happened in the time that the unaffiliated voters have surged in Colorado is this. democrats took over the state right not republicans it wasn’t both parties didn’t benefit equally or some third option came along and you know took over no no no no no democrats have become gods in colorado where where we now have half the state’s voters are unaffiliated so when greg says he is going to draw equally from the left as a right first of all the left isn’t going to move they’ll talk nice to you they’ll be real happy to you when you come to you know and speak Then they’re going to vote Democrat.
SPEAKER 07 :
Right.
SPEAKER 06 :
Why? Because Democrats are loyal. They are collectivists. Collectivists collect together. Individualists, we whine nonstop, and we want every single candidate to be exactly like me. Right. Okay? Right. Democrats aren’t like that. Next, Greg’s entire brand has been built on the right. He hasn’t been a Democrat for many years, okay? Virtually every belief that he espouses is on the right. All right. Virtually all his views are right wing. And here’s another big thing. Has Greg debated either of the Democrat candidates?
SPEAKER 03 :
I don’t believe so.
SPEAKER 06 :
No, he has not. Has Greg participated in any Democrat sponsored forums? Not that I know of. Where is he drawing from, John? The right. One side. Okay. And he knows that. He knows that. Now, I love you, Greg. I love you. But you know full well you’re campaigning on the right and you’re going to draw from the right. Are there people on the left you go out into their community and talk to? Yes. That doesn’t make anywhere near the splash and you know it. You’re going to have no draw from the left. Why? For the same reason that the Democrats are dominating now. The left, the collectivists collect. The individualists scatter. Only the side with individualists is the side where you can, you know, peel off some votes. So you are simply going to hurt the right and not the left. Greg Lopez is going to help the Democrats win bigger in November. Okay. He did have… Well, go ahead.
SPEAKER 03 :
I want to add one more thing. I’m not saying this to be mean or rude, folks, but you guys know me. I believe that we need to win. I believe that you need some wins under your belt, even when it comes to running for governor of the great state of Colorado. Now, those wins could come in all sorts of different ways, but unfortunately, we have some politicians, he being one of them, and the only race, by the way, that Greg’s ever won is when he won the special election. For CD, what was it, eight?
SPEAKER 06 :
I think so. I can’t remember.
SPEAKER 03 :
Make sure that I get that right. Was it seven? No, sorry, four. CD four. Four, okay. CD four. Kim Buck. So Kim Buck resigned. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. There was a special election, and Lopez had won that one.
SPEAKER 06 :
And he pledged only to serve out the last couple months.
SPEAKER 03 :
Which, to his credit, he did just that. Sure. But here’s my point. He hasn’t won a major election, even a statewide election, for anything even in Colorado. It’s nothing against him. And I’m not saying that because you lost there, you’re going to lose the governor’s race. But this will be his third attempt at running for governor of Colorado. And keep in mind, one of the things that he’s ran on in the past, to Andy’s point a moment ago—this was back in 2022— He said that he would outlaw abortions without exception, denied man-made climate change, and alleged that the 2020 election was won by Trump and was stolen. He actually lost in the primary to Heidi Ganahl by seven points. Now, my point is this. Yeah, how are those things going to sell on the left? Thank you, Andy. My point is those things are going to surface again. Anybody can go to Wikipedia and look at the very same thing that I’m looking at right now, and they will. Read them again. Okay, he campaigned again for the Republican nomination 2022. In the campaign, he stated he wanted to outlaw abortions without exceptions, denied man-made climate change, and alleged that the 2020 election was won by Trump and stolen. He then lost the primary to Heideggen all by seven points.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay, right there with those three views, unless he’s going to recant on those, and he has not.
SPEAKER 03 :
He won’t.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right there with those three views, you have lost every single Democrat vote in the state. Correct. Unless you’ve got some weirdo Democrat who is, I don’t know, a Fetterman type. Look, you’ve lost all of them. And not only them, but you have lost every left-leaning independent as well. Right. The unaffiliated. So you’ve lost them all. You’re not competitive in any way, shape, or form. But you will draw from one side ours. Okay? Here’s another thing I couldn’t stand. he kept insisting that John Rush doesn’t connect with voters outside our base. That he does, because you were asking him, you made it very clear. You said, look, you’re not going to take any voters from the Democrats. Certainly nothing that matters, right?
SPEAKER 03 :
I said no more than 5%, and I mean very gracious there.
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, way gracious. I would go 2%. But that’s fine. Who knows? Maybe in a perfect world, 5%. But you said right out, how are you going to draw from the Democrats? How are you going to draw from people who are not in our base? Because you’re saying you’re going to draw equally from all sides. How? And he said, because I connect with them. And you’re like, how? And then he said. You don’t connect with them. And you said that you, John Rush. Now, let me talk about this. Greg Lopez has spent the past, what, couple decades or whatever? I don’t know. Being a Republican politician only, okay? Meanwhile, John Rush has been working with all communities of all parties, employing them, selling to them, interacting with them in business.
SPEAKER 03 :
Correct.
SPEAKER 06 :
What is he saying? Why is he saying that you, and he said it twice, that you, John Rush, cannot connect with these communities, as he called it. These communities, you don’t connect with them, I do.
SPEAKER 03 :
Because I’m not Hispanic. That’s my guess.
SPEAKER 06 :
It seemed like that, didn’t it?
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s what I would gather out of it.
SPEAKER 06 :
You know, he didn’t say that, and I don’t know. I mean, but I’ll say it certainly seemed like he was saying because you’re a white guy.
SPEAKER 03 :
Right, because I’m a middle-aged, actually older white guy. I guess I can’t connect.
SPEAKER 06 :
It’s pretty offensive. I mean, I’m just saying. Now, I’m not going to go 100% on that, but that’s how it came off.
SPEAKER 03 :
Now, if you re-listen to it, that’s exactly how it sounded. You’re right, Andy.
SPEAKER 06 :
It sounded exactly like that. And last thing, he said the one thing that he would offer for the left— is that he wants low-income housing for outlying areas.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah, well, I asked him, okay, give me something that is, you know, something you’re going to run on, or as governor, one thing that you would like to do, and he picked affordable housing, which the first thing I said was, well, number one, not the proper role of government, but let’s go ahead and talk about it.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah. And then he said he wants these 1,000 or 1,100 square foot homes. He wants more of those being made. Okay.
SPEAKER 03 :
And I challenged him on that because of the developer and the cost and the return on investment and so on. Right. And basically, I was told by Greg that developers are greedy, which, by the way, I hate people when they say that.
SPEAKER 06 :
He literally said the greed of the developers. In other words, he said they’ve got a lot of, and I’m quoting him here, wiggle room in their profit margin to where they can afford to lower their prices a lot.
SPEAKER 01 :
And they don’t.
SPEAKER 06 :
And simply make less money. Here’s my question, John. You’re a wealthy developer. You can buy land here. You can buy land in Oklahoma, Missouri, Texas, Utah. Why would you buy it here if the governor here is saying you’re going to have a much lower profit margin?
SPEAKER 03 :
You wouldn’t.
SPEAKER 06 :
Why would you do that?
SPEAKER 03 :
You wouldn’t. You wouldn’t do it. So then I guess you end up having, which I hope isn’t the direction that Greg would head, but I guess then you end up having some quasi-governmental entity building houses, Andy, which is a disaster.
SPEAKER 06 :
Well, and even look at the end result, John. Low-income housing. Let’s think about it for a moment. Because you said, hey, none of that cheap land is available in the city. You have to do it in outlying areas.
SPEAKER 03 :
Correct.
SPEAKER 06 :
And he agreed.
SPEAKER 03 :
He did.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay. Those areas are Parker, Franktown, Elizabeth, places like that.
SPEAKER 03 :
Way out east. Strasburg. Strasburg, going way up north towards Meade and so on.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. Okay. Now, you tell me, or no, forget me, you tell all those red voters in those areas that they’re going to be overwhelmed with low-income housing.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s not going to sell well.
SPEAKER 06 :
Which they know means Democrats moving in.
SPEAKER 03 :
Correct. They’re not going to like that.
SPEAKER 06 :
Hey, they’ve gotten a taste of it right now in Elizabeth, Franktown, and Parker. Let me tell you something. The Republican voters in those areas hate it.
SPEAKER 03 :
I can’t blame them, Andy. I would hate it as well. We got Democrats coming in. Can’t say as I hate. I mean, I would hate it also. It would stink.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yes. Low income housing is a terrible thing for most of these areas. Okay. And by the way, so the idea is not to focus on one kind of housing like low income. The best thing to do is what you were talking about.
SPEAKER 03 :
Lower all the restrictions. Let’s lower all of what it costs to develop. Let’s start there. and let all form of housing correct expand across across the entire state and don’t pick a favorite right what do you think well that’s basically what i said and he somewhat agreed to that although you know again i was challenging him on the one point of you know affordable housing because by the way i i hate that term uh you guys have heard me talk about this numerous times i feel like affordability when it comes to housing has a lot to do with the desire of the buyer In other words, there’s a lot of these young people today that won’t buy those homes because it doesn’t match what mom and dad have and what they grew up in. They’re not willing to sacrifice to step down to have something to get started in. They don’t want to start a home. That’s my point.
SPEAKER 06 :
Well, there’s that. And also, let’s face it, Bidenflation took away all their disposable income. They’re not stacking up money to use to buy any house.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s part of it.
SPEAKER 06 :
They’re not just not buying small houses. They’re not buying big, medium, anything in between. They can’t afford it. Right. Okay, so let me sum this up. All right, and then we’ll go to break.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 06 :
Greg is going to draw entirely from the right.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yes.
SPEAKER 06 :
He is. And all of his talking, he didn’t give a single sustainable reason as to why he wouldn’t draw solely from the right. He is completely, he built his entire brand on the right, and the right is the side that scatters. The left will collect together. He’s not going to draw from the left. And he also, as you so aptly stated, he supported banning all abortions. I mean, come on. He supported positions that the left, there’s no way they’re going to go with him. Finally, the one left wing thing that he is advocating, low income housing, is the very thing destroying Republican communities across the state. Why would anybody want to vote for this guy?
SPEAKER 03 :
They wouldn’t. I just got some text messages along those same lines. Go ahead. Yeah, we don’t want that. The infrastructure, everything’s going on, low-income housing and so on. No, it just doesn’t work. And no, these people don’t want that in their backyard, Andy. They’re verifying that with their messages.
SPEAKER 06 :
Any place you put those, your house goes down in value.
SPEAKER 03 :
Exactly, and they don’t want that, which I don’t blame them. Veteran Windows and Doors coming up next. Save money when it comes to Windows and Doors today by going direct to the source. That is Dave at Veteran Windows and Doors. Find him by going to klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 05 :
No other window company can match the value for your money you get with veteran windows and doors. In fact, they’re so confident they can’t be beat that they actually encourage you to do your homework first. Get other quotes and compare window ratings, warranties, and installation methods. When you do, you’ll see the difference. Veteran will only sell you windows guaranteed to meet the new Colorado energy codes and built to last a lifetime. And their guarantee doesn’t stop there. Veteran’s exceptional installation process is backed by a five-year installation warranty. That’s true peace of mind, and it comes with long-term value. When it comes to cost versus value, no one comes close to our partner, Veteran Windows and Doors. Connect with Veteran today by going to klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 03 :
All right, Ridgeline Auto Brokers, where to buy? Looking to buy a new used car? They’ve got you covered. You can shop online at RidgelineAutoBrokers.com.
SPEAKER 16 :
Looking for the right car at the right price? Ridgeline Auto Brokers makes it easy. They specialize in quality vehicles priced between $15,000 and $25,000, perfect for first-time drivers, families, or anyone who wants real value without the hassle. Every vehicle is thoroughly inspected by Legacy Automotive, a trusted drive radio sponsor. That means you can buy with confidence, knowing your next ride is ready for the road. No dealer fees, competitive financing, and trades are welcomed. A 30-day warranty on every vehicle and your first oil change is just $1. Explore detailed videos of every car at RidgelineAutobrokers.com before you visit. Ridgeline also has a great consignment program to assist you in the sale of your car, truck, or SUV. So if you’re ready to buy, trade, or sell your vehicle, call 303-442-4141 or visit RidgelineAutobrokers.com. Ridgeline Auto Brokers, the right car, the right price, right now.
SPEAKER 12 :
Putting reason into your afternoon drive. This is John Rush.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay, we are back. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. And I got a text message in that said, I thought, this is talking about Greg Lopez, I thought he meant because John Rush is white and more financially secure than those he associates with more. That’s what I got. Well, I got that, and I’m also not Hispanic, and he is, of course. And keep in mind, folks, and I don’t think I’m wrong in saying this, I don’t know Greg’s net worth. I know what mine is, but I would venture to guess that Greg lives a fairly decent lifestyle just like the rest of us do. So the reality is I don’t think there’s much difference when it comes to the economic end of things between Greg and I. That’s my thought. I don’t know Greg’s personal financial statement at all, but that would be my guess. Well, Greg’s not poor. Yeah, he’s not poor.
SPEAKER 06 :
No, not by any stretch. And, you know, and by the way, if he wants to come out and just openly say it’s because I’m Hispanic and there are people who will listen to me because of the demographic flair of that, okay, I’ll accept that.
SPEAKER 03 :
Right.
SPEAKER 06 :
But say it.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah, good point.
SPEAKER 06 :
Don’t beat around the bush.
SPEAKER 03 :
Just say it.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, and by the way, another reminder, how many Democrats are inviting him to their forums?
SPEAKER 03 :
None, Andy.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay, and yet Republicans, a number of them have. Why do you think that is? Why? Because we’re individualists. We’re willing to listen to anyone. We will splinter off in a heartbeat.
SPEAKER 03 :
They won’t.
SPEAKER 06 :
The Democrats won’t. That’s right.
SPEAKER 03 :
They won’t. They won’t.
SPEAKER 06 :
All right.
SPEAKER 03 :
Before we go to – you want to talk about Tucker Carlson. Before we do that, though, I talked about this a couple weeks ago. Andy and I did. We didn’t spend a lot of time on it. And frankly, I didn’t spend a lot of time on this particular topic because I didn’t think it would go much – it wouldn’t go very far anyways. And our side was really getting in an uproar over it, and I didn’t really think much of it because, frankly, I didn’t care one way or the other. But the prostitution bill has been pulled, so we will not have legal prostitution in Colorado. And the reality is I didn’t care one way or the other, didn’t talk much about it because, to me, And I know I took some flack for this one, and I’ll take it rightfully so, but I just didn’t think it would go very far anyway, so why spend a bunch of time on something that isn’t worth dinking around with?
SPEAKER 06 :
I think this rescues our state. No, I don’t. But I did oppose the bill, so okay, that’s fine.
SPEAKER 03 :
But at the end of the day, neither one of us spent much time on it because I didn’t think it was going to go anywhere anyways, just to be real honest with you. All right, so what did Tucker Carlson say?
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay, and this comes from Town Hall where they’re commenting on it. Tucker Carlson, he made comments during a recent interview with Breaking Point’s host, Cigar and Jetty. And here it is. And he’s speaking of, you know, Trump calling on Iran to unconditionally surrender. He says, unconditional surrender means foreign troops get to rape your wife and daughter if they want, and everyone knows that. He continued, saying, it’s like the most atavistic instinct there is, and so to avoid that, people will do anything.
SPEAKER 03 :
What? Right. Andy, my brain just exploded.
SPEAKER 06 :
This is what Tucker Carlson believes about American and Jewish troops, Israeli troops.
SPEAKER 03 :
My brain just exploded.
SPEAKER 06 :
Our troops… For them to unconditionally surrender means our troops can go in and rape them. You know, Tucker, you have gone off the reservation.
SPEAKER 03 :
Well, we already knew that, but he just keeps proving it.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, but you know what he is? He’s an anti-American zealot. He hates America. He hates Israel. Or, you know, I don’t know if he hates America. I know he hates Israel. But I do know this. He demeans America.
SPEAKER 03 :
He’s a Jew hater.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, yeah. He’s a Jew hater, but he demeans America. You know why he doesn’t like America much? Because America doesn’t hate Jews enough. It’s all about the Jews for him. What do you think?
SPEAKER 03 :
I think you’re 100% correct. I can’t argue that one, Andy. And I said this before. It’s always interesting when you see a big name like Tucker leave an organization like he did, Fox News, which I’m not saying Fox News knows everything and that they are the ultimate and the know-all and so on. Although, typically speaking, when anchors like Tucker, who had a really good following and had good shows and had good ratings and so on – I’ve said this before, I’ll keep saying it – typically when they leave – There’s more to it than what you’re being told. And what I have to wonder with Tucker and Fox News is what did they know that we’re now just starting to figure out? Maybe they knew all of this all along and realized we want to disconnect from this guy as soon as we possibly can because we’re not going down that rabbit hole.
SPEAKER 06 :
I agree. I think they saw this coming. I really do. I think they saw this coming. By the way, I was debating with one of Tucker’s supporters a couple days ago. And this guy brought up a point that Tucker does like, and that is Sheldon Adelson. He’s a very rich Jewish Republican. He donated, I guess, around $100 million to Trump’s campaign to help his campaign and maybe some other campaigns. But $100 million. And what this guy insisted is that Sheldon, who is a Jew… Because of that huge donation, Trump is basically a puppet for Sheldon Adelson. And that is why Trump is doing this war for Israel. Now, as we talked about last week, obviously, this war is primarily about China and Russia. Okay. And I don’t want to go into all that again, but we’ve talked about that. Yes, yes, yes. But I came back and I said, really? Oh, okay. So when Elon Musk… donated not just more money than that, but also a ton of his time, does that mean that Trump is now a puppet of South Africa?
SPEAKER 03 :
Good question.
SPEAKER 06 :
I mean, really, are you going to say that, or are you only going to pick on the dirty Jew? Are you only going to say that dirty Jewish money is buying off Trump, but not all that South American money, South African money? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. That person split the scene. No answer. You know, this blows my mind. Has it ever occurred to anyone that Sheldon Adelson is just a Republican who loves America?
SPEAKER 03 :
And he loves Israel, too. And is willing to put his money where his mouth is.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah. By the way, what’s wrong with that?
SPEAKER 06 :
Nothing.
SPEAKER 03 :
If we had more of our side doing that, we would be a lot better off when it’s all said and done.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. And by the way, what is evil about people who advocate for Israel?
SPEAKER 03 :
Nothing.
SPEAKER 06 :
Why is that evil? I mean, it doesn’t make any sense to me. Why is it evil for people who are pro-Israel to use that money to lobby in America on Israel’s behalf? Wouldn’t Israel be suicidal if they didn’t do that? There’s only one nation in the world that can basically keep them alive. And that nation is split politically. Wouldn’t they be stupid not to lobby here?
SPEAKER 03 :
agree.
SPEAKER 06 :
Go ahead.
SPEAKER 03 :
Really quick. Somebody also said on the low income housing thing to find that seven to 10 years ago in Conifer low income was 500,000. So great point, by the way, yeah, low income housing, depending upon where you are in the whole metro area can mean all sorts of different numbers. Oh, yeah, good point, by the way. Great point. It’s different. West side of town, east side of town, north side of town, west side of town, you know, different corridors of town and so on. It’s different all over Andy.
SPEAKER 06 :
Can you explain something to me? Sure. Rent. Okay. Rent is high across the street from where Corey and I live. They have now built a bunch of new units and they’re very nice, but they are probably, I’d say half the size of our home.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay. At most. And they are renting for over 3000 a month. How does anybody come up with 3000 a month to rent something that’s much smaller than our home and get no equity?
SPEAKER 03 :
Well, lots of people do different things. Lots of reasons people do different things when it comes to renting. Sometimes they’re in between homes. Sometimes they could have come out of a messy divorce, something along those lines. In some cases, they just got here. They don’t know exactly where they want to live, so they’ll rent for X amount of time until they determine where that’s going to be. Some people just have this feeling that, you know what, I would rather let the landlord take care of everything. I don’t want to worry about doing any maintenance or repairs or whatever. I want the luxury to go do other things instead of work on a home every weekend, which is most of us do, but I enjoy doing it. So it’s sort of a hobby that you end up with anyways. But there’s different philosophies along those lines.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay. One last question. Let’s say you were a voter in Franktown or Elizabeth or one of those outlying areas. And Greg Lopez comes along and says, I am going to help the people in Denver move out to your area with lower income housing.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s not going to sell. Andy, that’s not going to sell at all.
SPEAKER 06 :
It’s going to sell great downtown.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s like a fart in church. No one likes it. No, it’s not going to work. It’s not going to work. No, I don’t think it is. No, it isn’t. It will not work. I can tell you that right now. It will not work. They will not like that. They already don’t like some of what’s going on along those lines already because it’s already happening.
SPEAKER 06 :
You know what I would have liked for you to have been able to ask, Greg? You didn’t have time. I loved all the questions. They were great. You couldn’t have taken any out. But if you had more time, I would like you to look at Greg and say, Greg, okay, you say that you’re not one party anymore and you like both sides equally. Okay, let me ask you this. California has absolutely fallen apart. Can you please give me the top four or five things that California has done wrong to drive people away? Tell us things that the left has done that you’re going to avoid.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s a great question.
SPEAKER 06 :
I don’t just want to hear how you connect, connect, connect, connect, connect with these people. I want you to tell me, honestly, what are the bad policies driving people out of California?
SPEAKER 03 :
Great question. Great question. Now, and again, truthfully, guys, I could have spent an hour or two on the phone with Greg. He had limited time. I’ve got limited time, of course. And with politicians, you know, you have to be careful how much time we actually spend because there’s equal access and so on. So given all of that. I felt like we did a pretty good job of asking the questions that we needed and really giving Greg a voice to let us know why he feels going unaffiliated. It’s not independent like everybody says. It’s unaffiliated. That’s the correct word here in Colorado. Why he feels unaffiliated is the direction that he should go. And I feel like he gave us those answers, although I don’t agree with his answers. And by the way, here’s my feeling on – and I didn’t say this because I didn’t want to be mean. But here’s my feeling as to why Greg went unaffiliated. He knows he’s not going to win the primary no matter what anyways. So if you want to stay in the race and have a chance to run all the way up to the election and have your name circulated and so on, you’ve got to go unaffiliated because he’s not going to win the primary. I agree. That’s my thought.
SPEAKER 06 :
I agree, but do you agree that he was really out of it?
SPEAKER 03 :
Yes.
SPEAKER 06 :
At this early stage.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yes.
SPEAKER 06 :
So what do you think, that Victor Marks is going to be the candidate and that’s it?
SPEAKER 03 :
I think it’s down to two or three, and unfortunately Greg’s not in the running, well, especially now, but I’m not sure that he would have been in the running prior to that.
SPEAKER 06 :
You don’t think he would have held on?
SPEAKER 03 :
No, and again, folks, I’m sorry, and I said this yesterday, I’m never mean, and I don’t want to sound mean-spirited or anything, but I’m a realist. And I throw things out that are real. And sometimes being real hurts. You know, it’s just the nature of the beast. I don’t know how else to say it. Just being real hurts. But when you’ve ran as many campaigns as Greg has, and you haven’t won any of those, that follows you, okay? It carries on with you. And people remember those things. And at the end of the day, no, he wasn’t going to win the primary. I’m sorry. Because of what I just said, that wasn’t going to happen. Period. it’s why i said i should have challenged him on this yesterday but i didn’t it’s why i said and i’ll stand by this all the way back to when everything was happening inside of the colorado gop and we were looking for a new chair what greg should have done is that he should have ran for chair he would be chair right now he would be helping with colorado forward on the republican side i think he would be a really solid leader in that area I do think he had the ability to bring some people together, make some things work very well that we don’t have right now. And I wish he would have done that. I didn’t challenge him on that yesterday because it wasn’t the time or the place. But I put a bug in his ear back when that was going on. And my gut feeling is Greg, you know, Greg wants to run a campaign. He wants to be, quote unquote, you know, governor of Colorado. It’s not in the cards, especially now. There’s not a snowball’s chance of him being governor now. Now, it’s just not going to happen. He should have gone and been the chair of the GOP here in Colorado. That’s what he should have done.
SPEAKER 06 :
Okay, one more question. You can now or after the break, whichever. Greg says his biggest reason for running independent or unaffiliated is because half the state’s voters are unaffiliated.
SPEAKER 03 :
And the GOP’s a mess. Well, and the GOP’s a mess. Don’t forget that part. Well, he said both parties are. Yeah, both parties are. But really what he meant was our side’s a mess.
SPEAKER 06 :
Our side’s a mess. Okay. Answer that. So he says half the state’s voters are unaffiliated. So, you know, they’re all going to be open to me. What do you think?
SPEAKER 03 :
No, they’re not. You’re right. They still vote according to their own belief system and their slant, which unaffiliated in Colorado. And I said this yesterday, they’re still going to vote mainly on the left for candidates. It’s so weird. They’re bipolar. So our unaffiliated voters in Colorado are very bipolar. Let me explain. Well, let me do this. We need to take a break. When I come back, let me explain why they’re bipolar and why they’re not going to vote for Greg as soon as I come back. We’ll do that in a moment. Dr. Scott’s coming up next. Live your best life. Feel the best you can. Scott will help you with all of that. And again, it’s really easy. Just give him a phone call. 303-663-6990.
SPEAKER 02 :
What if you could get over 110 lab biomarkers tested just like Dr. Mark Hyman advertises, but for a fraction of the cost and with a doctor who actually explains the results? At Castle Rock Regenerative Health, Dr. Scott Faulkner has recreated this powerful biomarker test panel at a substantial savings. We have a special price for both men and women today. Just $689. That’s a savings of over $2,500 over the standard price. And here’s the difference. With Hyman, you get numbers on a page. With Castle Rock Regenerative Health, you get Dr. Faulkner and his team walking you through every result, showing what’s off and creating a personalized plan to fix it. What’s even better, you don’t even have to be a concierge patient to get this pricing. This is open to everyone. Think about it. Most people’s deductible is higher than this special price. And your regular doctor, if he could get approved by your insurance, would never order this many tests, let alone know what to do with them. Call 303-663-6990 today or visit CastleRockRegenerativeHealth.com. Take control of your health at Castle Rock Regenerative Health.
SPEAKER 16 :
Finding the right health insurance plan can be confusing, and picking the wrong plan can cost you thousands of dollars more in medical costs out of your pocket. Call Paul Linegro at GIA Insurance, and his team of ACA health specialists will help you find the right plan for your needs and at the very best premium. As independent brokers, GIA Insurance can help you navigate through the maze of health insurance options so you get the right plan to fit your needs at the best premium. GIA never charges fees, and your premiums will never be any higher than going directly to the insurance companies or buying online. Receive the local hands-on service you don’t get with a call center or online. Whether it is qualified health insurance plan, dental, life, or vision insurance, GIA has got you covered. Call 303-423-0162, extension 100. GIA is an authorized enrollment center for Connect for Health Colorado, the only place you can get an advanced premium tax credit to lower your premium.
SPEAKER 03 :
Roof Savers of Colorado, where they will help you extend the life of your roof. And what I mean by that is a roof max treatment. It goes on the shingles, makes them a lot more pliable, makes them last up to 15 years longer. 303-710-6916.
SPEAKER 10 :
With material prices still high and supply chains stretched, homeowners are looking for smarter ways to protect their biggest investment, their home. Replacing a roof can be costly, but a roof restoration offers you a better budget-friendly option. At Roof Savers of Colorado, we treat aging roofs with RoofMax, a bio-friendly formula that restores flexibility, extends life, and saves homeowners thousands. And if a roof breaks, does need to be replaced we handle the full job from new roofs and storm damage to siding and gutters this winter make smart spending part of your home’s protection plan call 303-710-6916 or visit roofsavers.com for your free winter roof assessment roof savers of colorado value protection and peace of mind for colorado homeowners
SPEAKER 04 :
call in to the KLZ studio line, 303-477-5600. Now, back to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 03 :
All right, we are back. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. And here’s a synopsis of voters in Colorado, the unaffiliated. So the left always votes left. The right, for the most part, will vote right with some exceptions. Andy and I talk about this all the time, so I’m not getting into that. But we’re going to talk about unaffiliated right now. So I call them bipolar voters because what they’ll typically do, not all of them, but the lion’s share of unaffiliated voters. If you’re a Democrat, you have their vote. It’s as simple as that. Doesn’t matter what policies you’re running on. I mean, there’s a few rare exceptions where they may vote for Republican, but by and large, they’re voting for you because you have a D next to your name. Right. It’s that simple. Now, on the same token, though, if we try to run a ballot measure whereby it raises taxes, it’s a no. Fiscally speaking, they’re always going to be a no on that end of things. What they’re so stupid about, and I use that word on purpose, they’re so stupid and ignorant. They’re voting for the very same people that will override their fiscal vote that they’ll vote for, and yet they’ll vote for the same stupid politician with a D next to their name that’s going to override what they just voted against anyways. That’s how dumb they are, but that’s who they are.
SPEAKER 06 :
Well, remember a few years ago they voted to keep oil drilling. Then they voted in people who took it away.
SPEAKER 03 :
They are the most bipolar voters out there. And again, going back to the conversation about Greg, the reality is, no, they’re not going to vote for him because of what I just said. John, let me tell you, let me give the ultimate proof.
SPEAKER 06 :
Here we go. Okay. Do you know what party, political party in Colorado lines up the most with Colorado voters?
SPEAKER 03 :
Democrats.
SPEAKER 06 :
No.
SPEAKER 03 :
Oh, well. Libertarian. Yeah, you’re probably right on that.
SPEAKER 06 :
Libertarian.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, the Libertarian Party. Yeah, you’re right. You’re right. I mean, if you were to put, okay, what are all the most popular viewpoints in Colorado, you know, the most popular positions, the Libertarian Party lines up with them the most. Okay, the Libertarian Party has had a candidate almost every time around forever. How did they draw from that 50% of unaffiliated voters, John? They don’t. Why? Because this idea that that 50% of unaffiliated voters are totally open to persuasion and willing to follow the next Greg Lopez who comes along is a joke. They’re not going to do it. First of all, the majority of them are going to vote Democrat. They’re not going to splinter at all. And secondly, the only splintering you’re going to get is on the right. Correct. And not that many are going to splinter.
SPEAKER 03 :
Because there’s a certain amount already to prove our point. For those of you that maybe don’t understand this, there’s a certain amount already that are in Greg’s camp that have already splintered off, if you would. In other words, they’re backing Greg. They’re backing him financially. They’re door knocking. They’re doing different things to try to get him elected. They’re mostly Republican. Yeah. Well, is there any that aren’t?
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, I’m sure that you can always find a couple. you know, tokens.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah, I don’t know. I’m not in his camp. I’m not in his camp, so I don’t know. But by and large, those that are supporting him, I guarantee you, I guarantee you 95%, I’ll at least say that, 95% are Republicans.
SPEAKER 06 :
John, you still have a few pro-life Ds. And they are especially, by the way, in the Hispanic community.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay. So you might have a few supporters along those lines is what you’re trying to say.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, and I don’t know if they’ll be Hispanic or not, but I’m just saying.
SPEAKER 03 :
Okay, you could be.
SPEAKER 06 :
But, John, they’re going to be token. Overwhelmingly, his support is going to come from stealing from Republicans. Right. It’s not close. It’s not close.
SPEAKER 03 :
You’re right.
SPEAKER 06 :
And if unaffiliated voters in Colorado were totally open, then we right now would have a libertarian governor.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah, well, and by the way, Andy just said that, we have one that pretends to be one. I know that. And I say pretend because he really isn’t, but he pretends to be one.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. He’s a leftist, but he tries to act like he’s not.
SPEAKER 03 :
It’s why he’s considering, you know, pardoning, you know, Tina Peters, because he wants to play both sides of the aisle.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. He doesn’t care about her.
SPEAKER 03 :
Trust me, he doesn’t care about Tina Peters at all. He’s just playing politics is all he’s doing.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s it.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
Nothing more, nothing less. Right. And I said this yesterday, and I mean this, and I wanted to see what Andy thinks of this. Maybe I should ask you this, and we can talk about this when we come back from break.
SPEAKER 06 :
Sure.
SPEAKER 03 :
Michael Bennett, given where we’re at right now, because he’ll win the primary on the Democrat side, pretty convinced of that. Greg and I were arguing about this because Greg thinks he’s got a chance at winning. I say right now there’s nobody on our side, given what Greg is doing, that has a snowball’s chance of beating Michael Bennett. So, in turn, Michael Bennett will most likely be your governor of Colorado. And, Andy, I’m going to leave you with this, and you can either agree or disagree with me. Michael Bennett will make Jared Polis look like a conservative libertarian.
SPEAKER 06 :
All right, let’s talk after the break.
SPEAKER 03 :
As soon as we come back, we’ll talk about that. Golden Eagle Financial coming up next. Al Smith, listen to this interview, and if you want to reach Al directly, just go to klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 15 :
TJ here again with Al Smith of Golden Eagle Financial. Al, I’ve talked to retirement advisors before, and I don’t hear a lot of them talking about passive income, but I hear that in a lot of other spaces. So can you tell us a little bit about that and how that applies to retirement?
SPEAKER 14 :
Well, yes. And these aren’t necessarily things that I do myself personally, but many of my clients own real estate. And if they’re careful with how they vet their tenants, they’ll have a nice stream of income coming in. I’ve also met people who have investments in oil and gas, which generate a nice stream of income. I even know someone who has a rather expensive camper trailer that he will lease out to other people who want to go on a camping trip.
SPEAKER 15 :
So it seems like kind of the sky’s the limit for those kind of things. And how do you help guide folks through that? Or how does that apply to the different products and services that you give to folks?
SPEAKER 14 :
Well, I certainly don’t discourage it. But what’s nice about it is these are things you can invest in. And they’re totally separate from your IRA and the plan that your employer has, your 401k. These are things that you can do. completely independently of retirement plans through your work. And depending on how those are treated tax-wise, they can be a real enhancement to the other sources of income in retirement, your Social Security, pension, 401k, things like that.
SPEAKER 15 :
And that’s one of the things that we really love about Al Smith and Golden Eagle Financial is they get relational, and Al takes the entire picture into consideration. Al, tell folks how to get in touch with you if they want to schedule an appointment with you.
SPEAKER 14 :
Well, you can reach me at 303-744-1128. And if you’re driving, get in touch with KLZ, and they will put you in touch with me.
SPEAKER 15 :
And as always, you can find Al on klzradio.com slash money. Al, thanks.
SPEAKER 14 :
Well, you’re welcome. Thank you, TJ.
SPEAKER 04 :
Listen online, klzradio.com. Back to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 03 :
All right, we’ve got a call coming in, but before that, Andy, do you think if Michael Bennett does win, because right now, given what we’re doing on our side, I don’t see that being any different. I do think, in fact, he will, and we’ll take this call as soon as you get done answering. Sorry, never mind. We don’t have a call coming in. Okay, so you can answer this no matter what. Take your time. Given I think Michael Bennett will be our next governor… Knowing how radical his ideas are and what he’s proven as a track record in the past, will he make Governor Polis look like a conservative libertarian?
SPEAKER 06 :
Yes. And it’s going to be twofold, John. It’s going to be, first of all, because of who he is. As you said, Michael Bennett is going to take us to the left.
SPEAKER 03 :
He’s a hardcore Marxist, by the way, if you guys don’t understand that. He is.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. But here’s what we are staring in the face this November. And I’m sorry. I know we bring up the Davidians, guys. Please understand, though, it’s important.
SPEAKER 03 :
Really quick, by the way, just a side note on that. Yeah, go ahead. So we got to give credit where credit’s due. I was thinking about this this morning because now I’m seeing all over social media. memes and so on that are calling the Davidians the Davidians. Oh, yeah. But Andy and I didn’t invent that. No. That’s Charlie’s name.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
Charlie actually came up with the name Davidian. So we got to make sure that all of you that are listening, please give credit where credit is due. If you put Davidian down, you need to make sure that you give Charlie Grimes credit for that.
SPEAKER 06 :
They’re being called the Davidians statewide.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yes. So that comes back to Charlie. So Charlie gets all the credit for that, not even Andy and I.
SPEAKER 06 :
Well, I always thought Charlie was all-powerful.
SPEAKER 03 :
He’s the guy that get it all going in the first place. But anyways, my point is, people don’t realize, I don’t think even our side realizes, how bad Michael Bennett will be for Colorado.
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, he’s going to be terrible.
SPEAKER 03 :
He’s worse than Newsom in California.
SPEAKER 06 :
But here’s what’s worse. The Davidians are destroying our party in Colorado, and here’s what I mean. They have totally taken over the state central committee, and there are people out there yawning, oh, man, it’s inside baseball. Don’t worry, I won’t go far, okay? But I’m telling you folks that they are crippling our turnout network statewide. I believe that this November we are going to get annihilated by the Democrats. And I believe Greg is going to factor into that by stealing off a fair number of votes and also depressing Republican turnout. Because he’s out there telling Republicans, because he almost speaks solely to Republicans, he’s out there telling Republicans how ruined their party is. Okay? That’s not helping. All right. And so between Greg and the Davidians, and Greg is not a Davidian, but between him and the Davidians, I believe that they are wrecking our party. And folks, for those who think, well, Britta Horn’s in charge. Britta Horn is not in charge of the party anymore, folks. If you have been to the last couple SCC meetings, it was clear who was in charge.
SPEAKER 07 :
Mm-hmm.
SPEAKER 06 :
She is not in charge. They are. They have the numbers. They are in charge. This is their party now. It is doing what they want at the county level all across the state. Not in Weld. Okay, that’s a different area. But most of the state, they are in charge. And look where they’re in charge. They are in charge in Parker, where we now have a Democrat mayor. They are in charge in El Paso, where we now have a Democrat mayor in Colorado Springs. They’re in charge in Douglas County where the Democrats just surged and took over the school board. Everywhere they’re in charge, we get killed. And I’m telling you something, we are going to get killed. So here’s what I predict this November. They are going to storm to huge numbers. Michael Bennett will be the new governor, and he is going to have a veto-proof legislature and state senate.
SPEAKER 03 :
Meaning they will do whatever they want to do from gun control to health care to taxes to getting around and getting rid of Tabor to you name it, guys.
SPEAKER 06 :
A year from now, we will look back fondly on all the relative freedom we had at this time. Yes, under Polis.
SPEAKER 03 :
Like I said yesterday, you’re going to think Polis was a conservative after Michael Bennett.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
I’m not joking when I say that, folks.
SPEAKER 06 :
And I will also predict the Davidians and Rhino Watch, they’re going to try to blame this on Britta Horne. Oh, jeez. Who has no power now. No power.
SPEAKER 03 :
None. Andy? They’re in charge everywhere. These people, they’re just… I mean, I used to call them just utter morons, but they’re more than that. These are deceivers. They’re corrupt.
SPEAKER 07 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
They are… you know, borderline criminal in their behavior and what they do. I mean, these are scum of the earth individuals that just need to leave Colorado, period.
SPEAKER 06 :
John, their personal lord and savior, Dave Williams, was personally texting with and emailing with Britta’s vice chair and secretary undermining her the whole time. Britta has had no support. None. None. None. She was voted in by a slim majority of people who wanted her instead of them. Guess what? Those people have now been overridden. I’m telling you, I believe this November, and here’s another thing I’m going to predict. We’re also going to lose two more House seats. I believe we lose in CD8 and CD3. That’s too bad. Because of them.
SPEAKER 03 :
Because of what they’re doing.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, because they are dividing us so bad.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 06 :
I believe that they are going to suppress turnout for Jeff Hurd enough to where he is going to lose CD3. Because they want to be able to say, you put forth these mealy-mouthed moderates, and they got us to lose these seats. They’re going to try to make that happen, and I think they’re going to succeed. What do you think?
SPEAKER 03 :
No, I agree. So here’s a question. Whose side are they really on?
SPEAKER 06 :
Democrats.
SPEAKER 03 :
There’s no question. Are they really working for the Democrats is the bigger question.
SPEAKER 06 :
All of them, no. I believe there are those. I believe they’re working for themselves because they simply want to seize control of the Republican Party and milk it for money. But do I believe that some of them, are working together hand in hand with Democrats behind the scenes, it sure seems that way.
SPEAKER 03 :
Somebody said, you might want to explain to those of us that don’t know who David Koresh and the Branch Davidians were. Well, that’s probably, you know, here’s the thing on that. Just go Google that one, look it up, Wikipedia, whatever. That’s an easy one. You know, we did sort of, I guess you could say, Charlie stole the Davidian name from them, from the Branch Davidians. Yeah, you did. It’s fitting, and it goes along very well with what’s happening here in Colorado when it comes to those following David Williams, not David Koresh. Although, the blind faith following probably isn’t much different. No, it isn’t. Am I right in saying it that way? They’re probably not much different from one another.
SPEAKER 06 :
John, I debate these people all the time online, and here’s what is always the way it goes.
SPEAKER 03 :
They’re brainwashed.
SPEAKER 06 :
They’re brainwashed. They will not listen, and the second you corner them with the facts, they run. Every time. Every time. They run away. Every time. They can’t respond to arguments. They don’t care. It’s all rage and emotion.
SPEAKER 03 :
Somebody also asked, what do I think or what do we think about Phil Weiser’s chances? Will he be more extreme than Bennett? I don’t think he’d be more extreme than Bennett, but Phil’s just a bozo. Phil’s as dumb as a rock. He’s dumber than Michael Bennett, meaning he has no chance of winning. Sorry, he doesn’t, folks.
SPEAKER 06 :
I’m going to disagree slightly. I think Weiser would be to the left of Bennett. I think he would be even more radically wacko.
SPEAKER 03 :
I don’t know. But I don’t think it matters. Bennett is a through and through Marxist, Andy.
SPEAKER 06 :
I know, but so is Weiser. And Weiser is more of an activist. than Bennett. And that’s what I mean.
SPEAKER 03 :
Well, Bennett is. He’s just more quiet about it, Andy. He just doesn’t come out and do it on his front sleeve like what Weiser does. That’s all.
SPEAKER 06 :
I know. I know. I’m not saying their beliefs are different. I’m saying Weiser has more of the Antifa feel to him.
SPEAKER 03 :
You’re probably right about that. And that’s why he won’t win, by the way.
SPEAKER 06 :
Right. I don’t think he’ll win.
SPEAKER 03 :
He won’t win.
SPEAKER 06 :
But here’s the big thing. I don’t think it matters because of the complete division of the Republican Party statewide. What has happened to it? They’re going to run everything.
SPEAKER 03 :
It doesn’t matter. For those of you on the Democrat side asking if it’s Weiser or Bennett, I can tell you right now the DNC will be behind Bennett giving him all the money.
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s a done deal. Weiser’s not going to get the money. Bennett will. And the reason for the big donors and the reason for this is because Bennett’s already a senator.
SPEAKER 07 :
Right.
SPEAKER 03 :
So it becomes really easy for him to slip in and take over for Paul. For all of you listening, please hear me out when I say this. And Andy, I’ll agree with this. Yeah, this is by design.
SPEAKER 07 :
Oh, yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
The Democrats a couple of years ago sat down and said, OK, next time around, because Polis is termed out, we still want to control Colorado. What do we need to do? Who steps into Polis’s place? And they picked Michael Bennett right off the bat, I guarantee you.
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, yeah, because, and I believe that because they want to do the switch. Okay, he takes that, then he appoints Polis to the Senate.
SPEAKER 03 :
Correct.
SPEAKER 06 :
And then Polis can, he can ride as long as he wants in the Senate until he feels.
SPEAKER 03 :
Until he knows he wants to run for president.
SPEAKER 06 :
Until he feels that there’s a good election for him to run.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s right. That’s exactly right.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s exactly how it’s going to work.
SPEAKER 06 :
Oh, yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
So for those of you that don’t think that, or those of you even on the Democrat side that don’t think that, think again. So far, and again, this is not Andy and I boasting. It’s just simply data and looking at things and analyzing and so on. We’re very seldom wrong, guys.
SPEAKER 06 :
We’ve got a good track record.
SPEAKER 03 :
We’re very seldom wrong. And it’s because we can sit here and look at things. We’re not engulfed in the campaigns itself. We’re not on that level. We can see things from that 10,000-foot level. We have the ability to look at things a lot better in that case where we’re not sucked into everything going on at that street level, meaning we can be more analytical about it.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, look at it this way, John. If you’re Jared Polis, and who do you want? Okay, do you want to have to run in 28 and it’s only going to be 28?
SPEAKER 03 :
No.
SPEAKER 06 :
That’s going to be Vance Rubio. Do you want to run against that? You would prefer not to. You’d prefer to wait another election cycle.
SPEAKER 03 :
Sure, one or two cycles even. And see how it goes, right? He’s young enough. He can do that.
SPEAKER 06 :
Maybe a bad war comes along, something happens. You want that spot in the Senate.
SPEAKER 03 :
Mm-hmm.
SPEAKER 06 :
And you can run from there if you want.
SPEAKER 03 :
I fully agree. All right, we’ll do this. Cub Creek Heating and Air Conditioning. Don’t forget the air conditioning part because you might need that here in the not-too-distant future. Find them at klzradio.com.
SPEAKER 09 :
Save $56 off your furnace tune-up now with Cub Creek Heating and AC. Your furnace hasn’t had to work much yet, but you still need your furnace professionally tuned up before the real cold hits and your furnace kicks into overdrive. Cub Creek’s comprehensive tune-up includes a detailed 30-point inspection Covering everything from electrical connections to motors and all the essential components of your system. As Rheem certified pro partners, Cub Creek Heating and AC has the expertise you can always rely on. And Cub Creek makes sure to thoroughly clean your system before they inspect it and tune it up. so they have an accurate diagnostic of your system. Just one more reason we continue to recommend our trusted partner Cub Creek Heating and AC for your furnace and AC needs. Schedule your tune-up with Cub Creek Heating and AC today on our KLZ website at klzradio.com slash HVAC and download your coupon for $56 off your furnace tune-up.
SPEAKER 04 :
This isn’t rage radio. This is real, relatable radio. Back to Rush to Reason.
SPEAKER 03 :
One thing, too, for all of you listening that either are in the Davidian camp or are not in the Davidian camp, mark my words on this. The Democrats, whether they actually directly support you or not, are. Oh, totally. Because they want you to win. They want to see as much disruption in the GOP and to see the GOP fall as much as they possibly can. They’re in this to win it. We’re not.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah, the Democrats are the biggest supporters of the Davidians.
SPEAKER 03 :
Absolutely. All the way. If you don’t believe me, they will even help run ads to make sure that that candidate wins.
SPEAKER 06 :
They’ve done it to help Davidian candidates. Ron Hanks.
SPEAKER 03 :
Yep. Yeah, Hope. They’re going to do it for Hope. Hope Shepelman.
SPEAKER 06 :
Absolutely. They will run ads that will hurt Jeff Hurt.
SPEAKER 03 :
And make sure that Hope gets propped up.
SPEAKER 06 :
Yeah.
SPEAKER 03 :
And yet Hope will run around and claim that, no, that’s not the case.
SPEAKER 06 :
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Democrats run ads talking about how Trump endorsed Hope.
SPEAKER 03 :
Oh, they probably will. Yeah, you’re right. They probably will, Andy.
SPEAKER 06 :
And they’ll try to say it negatively, right, with a wink. Oh, Hope Shepard, we can’t trust her. She was endorsed by Donald Trump, who’s popular in CD3.
SPEAKER 03 :
Wink, wink.
SPEAKER 06 :
Wink, wink.
SPEAKER 03 :
That’s exactly what they’ll do. They’re not dumb. Like I said earlier, guys, they’re in it to win it. Our side doesn’t know how to win because of the Davidians and what they’ve done to the party up to this point. And unfortunately, they are still in charge. And you can blame Rhino Watch for a lot of this, which that’s a whole other conversation in and of itself. Another flower coming your way. Don’t go anywhere. Rush to Reason, Denver’s Afternoon Rush, KLZ 560. We’ll be right back.
SPEAKER 1 :
I’m a rich guy.
