The fallout from Thomas Massie’s political defeat has transformed into a national conversation. Tucker Carlson calls it the end of MAGA and the Republican Party. Tucker Carlson makes a false claim that people voted against Massie over “Islamic jihad”. More shocking details are revealed about the San Diego Islamic Center attackers. The BBC frames a story about dads in Afghanistan selling off their children with a sympathetic angle. Quinta Brunson will be starring in a “Betty Boop” remake. Rep. Chip Roy joins us to explain his new bill calling for an immigration ban for radical religious leaders, to react
SPEAKER 01 :
During Memorial Day at Lowe’s, shop household must-haves for less. Save $80 on a Char-Broil Performance Series 4-Burner Grill to chef up something special. Plus, get up to 45% off select major appliances to keep things fresh. Our best lineup is here at Lowe’s. Lowe’s. We help. You save. Valid through 527. While supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe’s.com for details.
SPEAKER 02 :
Visit your nearby Lowe’s on Route 299 in Highland. Welcome to the program. So Massey lost his election and the weeping and gnashing, the grinding of teeth, the weeping and gnashing, none of that stopped. It’s just gone on and on to the point where it’s now becoming, it’s now a national conversation. And it’s unfortunate that it even is like that. I mean, I’m not even telling you, the comments are insane. Have you seen some of these comments, Kane? Have you been seeing some of them? No. You don’t look at Facebook and Instagram comments?
SPEAKER 08 :
No.
SPEAKER 02 :
No. You haven’t looked at our Facebook and Instagram comments?
SPEAKER 08 :
No. No.
SPEAKER 02 :
I don’t look at the comments. Oh, my gosh. I can’t believe.
SPEAKER 08 :
I just like to see the content up there, and it’s like, okay, good. Our stuff’s out there. It’s good stuff.
SPEAKER 02 :
But you haven’t seen any of the way that people have been talking?
SPEAKER 08 :
No. Hold on.
SPEAKER 02 :
Okay. Well, you’ve been accused of being Jewish.
SPEAKER 08 :
What?
SPEAKER 02 :
Yeah. Seriously. Yeah. Jew Dana and her Jew staff literally is what one of the comments have been. And then other people are like, are you just surrounded by Jewish people working on your show? I mean, that’s the way it is. I don’t think I don’t I don’t know if people realize how unbelievably bad it is, but that’s how bad it’s been. It’s been pretty crazy. So the. Yeah, I know. Right. What? You’re wowing.
SPEAKER 08 :
I can’t even, where would they come up with that?
SPEAKER 02 :
Like, dude, you’re half Mexican. I mean, I’m saying that you couldn’t be Jewish, but, you know, you’re not.
SPEAKER 08 :
I mean, you literally call balls and strikes evenly on both sides of the aisle, no matter who the country is, ally or not. I don’t understand how they could even come up with getting close to even making that a true statement. I don’t get it.
SPEAKER 02 :
I don’t know, but it is. That’s the way it is. So this, you heard Tim Burchett talk about this. This is something that keeps going and going and going. And let’s just play some stuff. Let’s just play some stuff. Let’s do… Come in at… Let’s do four. This is part of the problem. Watch.
SPEAKER 06 :
So on one level, this is the saddest moment in a long time. It’s not just the death of Thomas Massey’s immediate political career, which may be resurrected. One never knows. It’s obviously the death of MAGA, whatever that was.
SPEAKER 02 :
Why is it the death of MAGA?
SPEAKER 06 :
But it’s also, of course, the end of the Republican Party, as we thought we knew it. Of course? The Republican Party of right now bears absolutely no resemblance to the Republican Party we thought we had just elected less than a year and a half ago.
SPEAKER 02 :
None at all. Wait, what do you mean? First off, how is it the death of MAGA? Yes. You’re talking about a candidate who is running who’s not even MAGA. Make America great again. I don’t consider myself MAGA. I consider myself adjacent. I’m just a constitutionalist. I’m not a joiner. You know, Massey was never a MAGA dude. He didn’t have the election stolen from him either, by the way. He got outvoted. And for all the people who keep going, we talked about this yesterday, who keep saying that it was stolen, that they… I’m pulling up some stuff here right now in front of me in my big four and a half. We don’t have prompters here because we’re not cable cast off rejects. But… He was outvoted. Every time that Trump challenged him before, Massey walked away with double digits. Double digits every time. But it was when Massey started leaning in to this nonsense. It’s when Massey started leaning in, as I wrote on Substack and we talked about yesterday, into the Islamist route, palling around with actual Holocaust deniers. I’m not making that up. When you go out and you say in the digital sphere that you don’t believe the Holocaust happened, that’s a Holocaust denial, which would make you a denier. That’s how words work. When he started leaning into that, when he messed up because he was chasing the Epstein thing for clout, that was another big bad thing. I mean, you realize that he didn’t actually name anybody, right? In fact, there’s a, look, I’ve been mad at Republicans about this longer than anybody else, I think. I’ve been very mad at them about this because I feel like they used it as a campaign stunt. All of them, every single damn one of them, Massey included. And I even named Massey about that as well because I felt like it was a stunt. They were running around out there and they were talking about, well, we’ve got to get these names out and these names. But then they apparently have investigated and are going through the legal process with everyone with whom they can go through the legal process. He had access to all of this stuff. And then the only time that he ever actually… said any names was when he named off four people he smeared four innocent people on the floor of the house by saying that they were essentially in the Epstein files even though the only association they had with the files were they were involved in a police lineup and dismissed that’s not running down and finding the powerful people he got himself in trouble and then when voters started thinking that it was a stunt and that it was a grift it turned them off Only 4% of his funding even came from Kentucky, by the way. I’m looking at the hard numbers from Open Secrets and all of the tracking applications that follow this and make this stuff available publicly on the thing called the internet. Only 4% of his funding came within Kentucky. In fact, the majority of it came from California.
SPEAKER 09 :
What?
SPEAKER 02 :
Yep. The majority of it came from California, that big red state. Kind of crazy. The other thing that people keep messing up is, you know, when you look at the ballots, Massey got fewer ballots than Ed Galbraith. That’s how he lost the election. People keep saying that it was stolen. I mean, in fact, that’s one of the things that Tucker has been promoting is that the election was somehow stolen. That’s what the left does. The left does that. They keep talking about, well, you know, they spent, what is the figure, $32 million? Or no, yeah, $35 million was spent in the Kentucky seat. That’s the total for both of them. I’ve seen podcasts to stand people with a million followers say that Ed Galerain spent $35 million in the primary. I’m not kidding you. Literally have said it. That doesn’t make any sense because that’s not even in any way accurate. No, that’s not how it went. More than 35. That’s the total for both. That is the total for both. Steve asks if he was called Jewish, too. Yes, you were, Steve. You guys are all Jewish now, apparently. I don’t know if you knew that. But that’s the total that was spent. Massey and Ed Galerain, Thomas Massey and Ed Galerain, actually Massey outraised him. Massey raised more money than Ed Galerain. The difference was about maybe a million and a half, two million dollars when it came to PAC money. that purchased advertising. And both Massey had it and Galrain had it. So it was a pack that comes in, and then they purchase ad time. They do what they call media buys. That’s when they purchase ad time. Those are very expensive, especially during campaigns, because the price is pricey. So there was not really very, there was little difference in spending between them. So all these people running their mouths, you realize that I can literally just go and look at it, the FEC reporting, and immediately disprove you? Why would you do that? Why would you just make stuff up? But see, they realize the people lying to you about this know that you’re not going to do that. because you got dinner to make and laundry to do. And you trust these people to be honest with you. And they’re not going to be honest with you. These people are no better than the legacy press. Their biggest complaint with the legacy press is that they weren’t the ones in control of the information. That was their biggest complaint. They wanted to remake the legacy press in their own image. They wanted to become the legacy press. And that’s what they’ve been trying to do. They got rejected by cable. So now they’re in this fear. Unfortunately, we were born here. They’ve merely adopted it. But they’re lying to you. These are people that you thought you could trust, and they’re taking advantage of that. They’re trying to act like they’re conservative or Republican so you let your guard down, and then they fill your mind with BS. They’ve been lying to you this entire time. They’re lying to you about the amount of money that’s raised. I mean, this stuff, guys, it took me three seconds to look up the amount that was spent and the difference in donations and the difference in PACs. Thomas Massey outraised campaign donations, Ed Gowrain, by a decent number, not a lot, but a decent number. He outraised him. The way that legacy press and podcasts stand and these cosplaying, tranny conservatives, what they’re trying to tell you is that the whole entire $35 million was spent by Ed Gowrain. That’s a lie. And shame on them. These people are no better than the demons that are on MSNBC. They are no better. It’s just disgusting. But this is how, this is what it is. Here’s the other thing people don’t realize. Massey, and this is why I’m actually not MAGA, Massey did not vote for Trump’s issues. Remember he endorsed him? Massey ended up endorsing Trump, and then he turned on it. We’ve never changed, Massey changed. He also said that he signed a pledge. He literally ran on term limits. He signed a pledge to only serve three terms and he broke that pledge and continued running for office. We didn’t change, Massey changed. I mean, I have it right now, Thomas Massey’s policy on term limits. I took the screenshot from his campaign website Just in case anybody wanted to take issue with it. He literally says, yes, there should be term limits set for members of Congress. I actually don’t agree with term limits because I think the term limit is the voters vote. But I digress. He didn’t vote for the big, beautiful bill. The big, beautiful bill was the entirety of Trump’s economic package, literally his whole term. in that bill. That is what voters voted for. I don’t like the big, beautiful bill. That’s why, again, I say I’m MAGA adjacent. I like Trump. I voted for Trump three times, but I wouldn’t describe myself as MAGA. We didn’t change. Thomas Massey changed. And he, after he endorsed Trump, Voters saw that and supported it. He turned around and voted against the one big, beautiful bill, which also included ICE funding and several other things. That enraged his voters. Again, they didn’t change. Massey changed. That made them mad. They voted for Trump. Trump took that district, the fourth congressional district, by leaps and bounds. So what did you think was gonna happen? When you literally vote against the president that your voters voted for, when you broke your promise on term limits, when you clout chased on Epstein and instead of actually naming anyone, you smeared a bunch of innocent people who, if he had not done that on the congressional floor, they would be suing him for defamation right now. But he’s protected from defamation and libel because it was said on the congressional floor. Again, none of us changed. Massey changed. Oh, I have a lot more of our partners that help bring you the program. It’s our friends over at Preborn. It’s a great organization that’s determined to continue helping as many babies as possible this May. And they’ve extended their goal that they want to reach by saving thousands of lives. They saved over 80,000 lives last year. They brought 10,000 women to Christ and they offer free ultrasounds to women who are experience, who are facing unplanned pregnancies. They want these women to feel confident in choosing life and they work with them for the first two years of these children’s lives to make sure that they get started on the right foot. And you can join their mission. $28 is the cost of one ultrasound. That’s it. And you all made this happen last year. There are 600 donations, actually less than that now, but still a couple of hundred donations of $28 away from reaching their Mother’s Day goal. And you made it happen last year. I know you can do it again this year. You can visit preborn.com slash Dana. Give securely. They have a four-star charity rating. You can give with confidence. Everything’s tax deductible. You can also dial pound 250 and say the word baby. Preborn.com slash Dana or dial pound 250. Say the word baby. Let’s save some lives.
SPEAKER 03 :
Liberty Nation with Mark Angelides.
SPEAKER 05 :
Gerrymandering across the United States reaches its peak. And at least in the UK, the two-party system is dead. Find out why on Liberty Nation Radio.
SPEAKER 03 :
Author, columnist, managing editor of LibertyNation.com. Podcast host and conservative policy advocate. We dismiss history at our peril. Liberty Nation with Mark Angelides.
SPEAKER 02 :
Hey friends, quick ask. If you’re enjoying the show, hit follow on this podcast and leave a quick rating and review. It makes a huge difference. The more you do that, the more the tech overlords have to show this program to new people. So hit follow, drop a review, and help us grow this community. So welcome back. We’ve been discussing a lot of things coming up. Let me tell you what we got. I got a million windows. Bear with me on my big giant We’ve got a couple of guests coming up for you later in the show. We’ve got Congressman Chip Roy at the bottom of this hour. And the next hour, we’ve got Steven Yates. I happen to think that the whole push against the data centers is a Chinese psyop, and we’re going to talk with Stevie Yates about it. Now, in full disclosure, we were also trying to accommodate Mays Middleton today, who’s also running for AG. We had this show booked for quite a few days, and we heard from Middleton’s people yesterday, and we were trying to make it work to get him on in the first hour, since it’s difficult to put someone in the first segment. So we always go to the bottom of the hour, because it’s also the longest segment. But he wasn’t able to make that work. But just full disclosure, so you all know that. But we have those two guests for you. And we’ve been going over all of this other stuff. You know, I don’t want to spend too much longer on the Massey thing, just because I’m just so I’m just getting tired of it already. And The big takeaway is that he won or Ed Galleran won fair and square. That’s it. He won fair and square. And Massey brought this onto himself. The problem is that you have people who are laughing at it and making fun of it and saying it was stolen, that the election was stolen. They’re using that line. And then you have this. This is audio cut five. Whatever this is from the head podcast to Stan Honcho. Listen.
SPEAKER 06 :
In a race like this, there’s evidence of it. And that evidence takes very familiar forms. Enthusiasm, joy, and just sheer numbers. Like people show up, they can’t believe it. We beat the evil Thomas Massey with his jihadi backers. This is a blow against Islamic jihad, whatever that is.
SPEAKER 02 :
He’s making a strawman argument. What is he talking about? Who said Islamic jihad? Show me one instance where somebody said that. He just makes up stuff to argue against it so he can seem like he’s right. No one ever said that. No, what we did, and see how he tries to very subtly do a Mott Bailey here. Oh, Islamic Jihad. I mean, don’t you all think that’s crazy? But that’s not what was said. No, what was said is that he has some very curious Islamist backers who have absolutely donated to pro-Hamas candidates, candidates who back Sharia. Rashida Tlaib, Cory Booker, not Cory Booker, Cory Bush, Rashida Tlaib, Cory Bush, Ilhan Omar, Cornel West, all these people. The dude who was up there running for mayor. The other guy who was running for Senate up there. I mean, very, very far left Islamist candidates. the people who donated to Massey donated to all of those. All of those people. So yeah, that’s a big issue. And I think, yeah, you absolutely can ask questions about that. But to laugh it off and be like, well, it’s just Islamic Jihad. You are literally saying everybody was bought and paid for by the Jews. Let’s be honest about it. And I made that mention. I’m so throttled on X. I can’t believe there hasn’t been a class action suit against making people purchase accounts and then you throttle the hell out of them. I don’t know how that works. But The whole point of that of this is that all of these people, they they get money like even Tucker has gotten money from people who are Islamists. I mean, that’s like one of the people who helped finance his media venture. Right. I mean, Malik, these are these are people that if the shoe were on the other foot, they would be questioning them all day long. But the problem is, is that they don’t have. any kind of criticism if it’s money coming from those people because those people aren’t Jewish. In fact, Jews are their entire problem. That’s their entire problem. It’s reverse intersectionality, like to a woker degree. And if you don’t know what that means, intersectionality, that’s what all the wokery is. So I’ll give you a really easy example to remember. So If you have a black woman and then you have a man who wants to be a black woman and is trans, he beats her because he has the little additional identifier of being trans. Every little variable multiplies, and it’s supposed to be a substitute for merit, and it’s supposed to guarantee automatic influence. That’s what intersectionality is. So you have all of these. The left multiplies all of these different identity variables And the woke Reich subtracts the person entirely if they’re Jewish. So that’s how it works. It’s like reverse intersectionality. That’s exactly how it works. So just like I said, to a woker degree, that’s the crazy thing about all of this is it’s all leftism. It’s all leftism. Every bit of it is leftism without exception. And people keep saying, well, it’s a foreign country. It’s not a foreign country. Again, domestic people. I explained all of that in detail yesterday. But Massey lost the election because Massey lost the voters. He lost early voting and he lost in-person day of election voting. I was looking at the data. It’s all available on the Secretary of State’s website because that’s what the Secretary of State does. It’s literally they run elections. And all of that data is available on their website. He he lost every single vote. I mean, it’s just there’s no other way to put it. I don’t know how else you put it. By the way, the list thing, you know, I was telling you there’s never been a collection of names or a list of names. There’s been some names that came up in the Maxwell trial. And they have one exhibit that’s under seal. But this has always been like a lawyer grift to try to keep this thing going, keep that aspect of it going. There isn’t anything to blow open. Massey would have his ass sued off for defamation had he not read the names of those innocent people. on the floor and had done it somewhere else. There’s a reason why he only said it on the floor, because I don’t even think he knew what he was doing. He just hurried up and went up there and decided to read some names to try to make it look like he was actually doing something. He campaigned like Trump did on the Epstein thing, and then he didn’t do a damn thing about it. So Massey in that regard is just as bad as the POTUS that he criticizes. And I say this as someone who’s known Massey, but I’m going to tell you what, if Ron DeSantis, who I really like, if Ron DeSantis went out and did the same nonsense, I would absolutely jump on his ass too. Because I’m not a political zealot. Unlike all these click whores, I’m not a political zealot. Now. Like I said, I’m not going to spend that much time on it. This idea that he’s going to run for president, that’s the other thing that podcast is staying decided to push. That’s never going to happen. If you can’t even win your own district, a solid red district. You don’t have a shot. Bottom line is it didn’t. This is a great thing that my friend had sent me that he had posted online. Massey had zero substantive accomplishments in Congress to help his district. That’s true. I went back and dove in this guy’s record. He did not solely sponsor a single bill. And he only co-sponsored a handful. You cannot argue with what’s been filed. Rokanna’s district, similarly, my friend wrote, has countless issues and is losing people by the day. The big thing he points to is them teaming up to pass the most consequential legislation in modern history, which is really just a left-wing messaging bill meant to distract from real issues. The Epstein bill helped zero people in either district, which is what voters care about. It revealed zero criminal activity. It was an attempt to shift focus from real issues to a case that had been over for four years and that the people involved never actually cared about in order to push various conspiracy narratives that they now use as the basis of their entire worldview. Did a bunch of rumors and conspiracies from those files help the homelessness in either of these guys’ district? Did it reduce home prices? Did it help lower the tax burden? Did it take any pedophiles or criminals off the street? No. But it allowed him to rant about an imaginary quote-unquote Epstein class, which is the phrase that pansies use when they’re too cowardly to say Jew, while fundraising and associating with the worst people imaginable, including defenders and promoters of various sexual deviants. In fact, Massey and Roikana were so desperate to pretend that they achieved something, they ended up accusing four random people who were in a police lineup with zero connection to Epstein of being his rich co-conspirators, including a random mechanic. It is obvious both men never cared about helping people or their districts. They wanted to be influencers for the bigoted extremes. Massey will never hold elected office again. His best job, his best hope is to run is to join the podcast world. He can be one of the people that all the podcasts to stand folks interview over and over again. So can we talk about this Islamic center of San Diego pivot? So in addition to being the mosque. That was attended by two of the 9-11 hijackers. The imam and his wife, both of them, I said yesterday, justified October 7th. They held a vigil for the martyrs who perpetrated it. I’ll say it again. They held a vigil for the martyrs who perpetrated it. And now, you know the security guy that was killed? He sounds like Tucker Carlson. He says all the same stuff Tucker does. And podcastistan does. Amin Abdullah, he was an extremist with jihadi friends. He posted so much stuff about Hitler on his social media pages. It is crazy. And there are screenshots galore. Some of it’s really nasty. But He absolutely was an extremist, and he talked about the final solution. He talked about, oh, by the way, just in case you thought, oh, well, I get off scot-free in this. I’m not Jewish. No, he also hated infidels. Yeah, they ranted about infidels quite a lot there at the center, too. Hmm. Wow. Cain, that sounds so familiar.
SPEAKER 08 :
Doesn’t it?
SPEAKER 02 :
Huh. All of that happening at that Interesting. And the wife was really scrubbing her social media platform. Now, the one of the I don’t want to say their names. One of the killers involved, he was suspended from high tech high after allegedly threatening to shoot up the school. They said students and staff reportedly knew that he was becoming radicalized, but he was still allowed to attend prom and grad night. According to one of the now they will not name them, but it was a teacher at the school. They had sent an email to several local reporters there. asking, quote, I am purposefully anonymous, but wanted to ask why no one reported the mosque killer, his high school history at a high tech high, Chula Vista. He was suspended last year for making a threat to shoot up the school. Parents were kept in the dark, but all the kids knew about it. He was suspended and later permitted to attend prom and graduation and the lock in that they had. Would you let your kids go to something like that, knowing that there was a classmate that was doing that? I wouldn’t. I would have a huge problem with it. And, I mean, his parents apparently had to have known, but they, I guess, did nothing to intervene up until the last minute. I mean, that is just, well, that’s, I mean, reckless. That’s endangerment. There’s a lot more coming out about this. Now, a lot of people will say, well, that doesn’t excuse. No one’s talking about that issue. But here’s the thing. You have people who are preaching heinous violence and they’re shocked when it shows up on their doorstep. I mean, these were people who preached at the center about Islamic jihad all the time and going after infidels. And then they’re shocked when it shows up on their doorstep. What the hell did you think was going to? I mean, good grief. It’s not an invitation to anything. But my gosh, the left suddenly doesn’t want to use their same standard of measure for conservatives or Republicans when it has to do with jihadis. Our partners that bring you the program, it’s the friends over at Native Path. Native Path is the place to go for college. And it was invented by a doctor who spent years. looking for clean collagen for his patients, there was always something wrong with something, with any of the things that he tried. So he created Native Path. And this is collagen your body can actually use. You know, when you turn 30, your body produces one to 2% less collagen every year. That’s the protein that keeps your bones dense, cushions your joints, firms your skin. It also helps with vitamin D production, hormones, everything. And a lot of people lose it and they lose a lot of it without even knowing it. So this is where native path collagen comes in. It’s grass fed and it’s clean. It dissolves easily in coffee or water. There’s no taste, no clumping. There’s no chalk taste like you would get from some of this stuff. And this, you know, this is really the way to go. You’re getting just the best collagen that you can get and you’re getting that protein that, you know, the hair, the nails, all of it. And right now, they also are offering 45% off your purchase. Visit getnativepath.com slash Dana. You try it risk-free. 365-day money-back guarantee. Again, collagen in your body can actually use. Visit getnativepath.com slash Dana for up to 45% off. I have a handful of stories here, and we’re going to get into, Stevie Nates is going to be joining us at the bottom of the hour, because I have been very… interested in this whole data center thing. And I know a lot of you have emailed me about it. Whenever I am, I don’t want to say late in talking about something. I don’t like to rush to talk about something just to be first. I want to take my time and make sure that I’m thoroughly understanding everything that’s involved. It usually involves a lot of off-air conversations with experts and maybe some people who don’t even really want to come on air, but they want to give you insight. to really fully understand the situation. And the data center thing, like people in my hometown of Festus, Missouri, they just defeated the creation of a data center that was going to be put in the area. And my first instinct is to be like, yeah, because we don’t want it to take all the water and all that stuff. But then I’m like, wait a minute. Something feels off. There’s something that just feels off about the whole thing. Should we be that excited to not have data centers? Because if we don’t have them, who’s going to have them? It rhymes with shmina. So then I started kind of looking around, and I noticed that there was a lot, or not was, there are a lot of Chinese influencers that very much would love it for us to not have the creation of data. They want us to fall behind, like we did with rare earth metals, fall behind China with that. So the question then becomes, was there a way to do it responsibly and not allow China to take first place in this? Because if they control that, then it becomes a NATSEC issue. So we’re going to talk to Steven Yates about all of this coming up. In the meantime, though, oh boy, do I have some things for you. I just had me pull this piece up. I saw this, it’s from, originally it was from the BBC. And it’s, I don’t quite know exactly how to present it. It has to do, so here’s the headline, BBC. Selling children to survive. Afghan fathers forced to make impossible choices. Wait, what? I am so confused about this. The BBC launches into the story about these families in Afghanistan who are selling their daughters for marriage, right? That’s what they’re doing. They’re selling their kids for Marriage. And these are really young kids, too, right? They have this one guy, 45 years old, Juma Khan. He found three days of work in the past six weeks. And he says that he thinks his kids are going to die of hunger and all of this stuff. And he goes, I’m willing to sell my daughters. Now, this guy is like 40. He’s like, what? What did I say? How old did I say he was? It stated his age up here. OK, he’s 45 years old. He is healthy and he can do some kind of he can he can sell his labor. Um, but now he’s selling his daughters for marriage and they’re usually being sold. Usually the customers they’re sold to old dudes that have money and that those are the people who buy them. I, I can’t, I don’t know. I can’t even imagine something like that. And then the way that they put it though, It makes it sound like the fathers, oh, these are very sympathetic figures, right? These fathers are very sympathetic figures. Isn’t it so sad that they’re having to do this? Well, wait a minute, though. It talks about this one family. They’re selling. I’m looking at this story right now. So one family is selling their daughter to one of the brothers to buy. What? a relative that’s going to buy his six-year-old girl as a child bride. And all of the people, like, so social media has been saying, well, that’s the custom. If you look at the notes on the BBC article, the people are defending it. They’re saying, well, all of these profiled cases, this is selling daughters for marriage is a longstanding cultural practice in parts of Afghanistan, et cetera. Um, I don’t care. That’s barbaric. And the other part of this makes me think, first off, why are they putting it in this sympathetic light? Like the dad’s the victim. Hardly anything is said about the little girl. The dad is so sad that he’s got to do this. They’re making impossible choices. So the uncle is buying his niece as a child bride. And a lot of these girls end up pregnant before they’re 12. It’s pedophilia. But the uncle isn’t decent enough to just help them out without having to sexually violate their six-year-old daughter? Kill all of them. This is ridiculous. Seriously? He won’t help financially to not have his relative starve, but he’ll buy the six-year-old? That’s not a man. That’s an animal. And why, here’s the bigger thing. So I read this piece. Why is that never discussed in the article? Cain, that’s not ever brought up in the article. I mean, I read this piece. I have it open again. At no point… Do they get into how maybe the rich family members, and a lot of the times it’s like a cousin, it’s like a rich uncle, something like that, that ends up buying the daughter. Why do they not have the decency? Does their religion not allow for charitable acts? Oh my gosh. But you know what the angle of the story was? They were trying to shame foreign governments for not giving them enough aid money. That really was ultimately the soul of the piece. They didn’t really care about any of that other stuff. In fact, they quote, we’ve had help from no one, not anybody in the government, no NGOs.
SPEAKER 1 :
Huh.
SPEAKER 02 :
The Taliban blames the previous Afghan administration. I’m shocked at this. There is not at any point does the journalist go, hey, if the uncle and all of these other rich men are wealthy enough to literally buy your child to save your family, then why do they not just give you money as a charitable act in your faith? That is never asked, ever. It’s just, well, that’s how it works here. I am And it’s a British reporter, a British female reporter. And I’m just shocked that that wasn’t a question that was brought up. That’s the culture. That’s considered acceptable. And the BBC had no issue with it at all whatsoever. If you sell your child for sexual slavery… You’re not a parent. You’re an animal. You’re an animal. By the way, the BBC is government-funded. So basically, you have British taxpayers that paid to have this article written to defend a human trafficker that sells their own kid into sexual slavery, if you want to look at it through that lens. Like, they’re actually trying to justify it. The biggest thing in this article in the BBC isn’t the fact that the guy was selling his daughter. It’s not the fact that a… And you know the uncle’s, like, 52. Oh, Kane and I are both going to retch. Six year old. But then they always, I read another article that was similar to this, where it was a nine year old that was being purchased. And then the guy buying her who was in his late forties was like, yes, but we’re not going to consummate it for another couple of years. Oh, you’re going to wait until she’s 11. And that’s supposed to be the, I know, Cain’s eyes are, this is totally like a pitch black corner over here. Cain’s eyes are so big. They’re like two moons over in the corner. You look like, it’s like a Warner Brothers sketch over here.
SPEAKER 08 :
It’s like, what do they call it? It’s sickening. What is it, the Mohammed Protocol? Is that what they’re doing? They’re waiting a couple years?
SPEAKER 02 :
Yeah, yeah, being like Mohammed. Nine-year-old.
SPEAKER 08 :
Good stuff.
SPEAKER 02 :
The whole article was about shaming foreign governments for not giving them enough money. Like, well, the reason these men are sick perverts is because you don’t give them money. Wait, how does that work? So they stop being sick perverts when the appearance of a dollar manifests and when a dollar manifests in front of them. Well, I was going to rate this six year old, but here’s some money from a foreign government. I guess I won’t now. The fathers look like the victims, and then all the Western nations are supposed to look bad because they didn’t give money to this. You cannot make this up. I don’t know. Here’s something else for you. I’ve got two quick things. One of them I don’t think I’m going to be able to get through quick enough. Should I do that? Let me do the Betty Boop one. So Betty Boop, they’re making a Betty Boop movie. Betty Boop, she’s a flapper, right? Isn’t Betty Boop a flapper?
SPEAKER 08 :
What the hell’s a flapper?
SPEAKER 02 :
I’m sorry, what?
SPEAKER 08 :
What the hell’s a flapper? What do you mean when you say she’s a flapper?
SPEAKER 02 :
Okay, you know what a flapper is? Like in their 20s? That was like, they were, so flappers, they were rebelling against the more traditional dress at the time. So the women cut their hair and they had the fringe. So my husband’s grandmother- I think was a flapper that was described. And they would wear the headbands with the feathers and all that. That’s like the flapper style. Anyway.
SPEAKER 08 :
I like.
SPEAKER 02 :
Isn’t Betty Boop a flapper is what I thought. Makes sense, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, so the, let’s see. She’s a cartoon character. Everybody knows Betty Boop, right? She, I think, was created like in the 30s. So they are casting Quanita Brunson. She’s starring and developing the Betty Boop movie. And there are a lot of people that are upset about it. Because Quanita Brunson is black and Betty Boop. is white, apparently. Well, not apparently, but people are apparently upset by it. I don’t know that I care about this one. Because even though it was the 1920s, there were black women in New York and et cetera and performers that were flappers. Josephine Baker, hello, was a flapper. This one, I’m not, as long as she keeps her hair short and actually tries to match Betty Boop’s hair, which was the thing, I’m not really upset about it.
SPEAKER 08 :
The nostalgia is the period of time. So if she aligns with that period of time and all things and suspends that disbelief.
SPEAKER 02 :
I’m going to need her to dress like it. I’m going to need her to have the vocal affectation because that’s how Betty Boop had. But because I mean, so Josephine Baker, I am. So I love Josephine Baker. I love her story. I love her. You know, she spied on behalf of the allies. Right. That woman was sneaky and heroic. She was amazing. And she she was in that era. So it doesn’t seem ahistorical. And the reason I think that some people zero in on that stuff is because this world is so hellacious that you really have to get over a lot to get involved in it. Do you feel that way? You really have to get over a lot of reality baggage. to suspend your disbelief and get really invested in a story anymore. And so as long as there is some historical association, I don’t mind it. Now, the Holland of Troy, that was the one that people objected to because that is ahistorical. And it’s anachronistic and ahistorical. And the Odyssey and the Iliad, I mean, the descriptions exist there. And the descriptions of that person was to be an example of Zeus’s deity, not man’s specific preference for beauty. It was an example of Zeus’s power. So that’s why I think people objected to that casting. This one, I don’t really have an issue with, but if she grows her hair long, I’m going to have an issue. We have a lot more on the way as we move our partners that help bring you the program. It’s our friends over at ghost bed. They make, I think they make the best mattress out there. It is such a comfortable bed. It really is. And if you are needing a mattress, before you do anything, you need to check out GhostBed. Because first off, they don’t really build mattresses like furniture. They treat them like engineered sleep systems. There’s just no other way to put it. Because the bed’s a piece of health equipment. I mean, it’s designed to provide you relief and recovery. It’s not just supposed to be for looks and floof, right? Your body’s supposed to heal while you sleep. But if you’re waking up at night… and you’re tossing and you’re turning and you’re uncomfortable and you’re just you know waking up sore and exhausted that’s not healthy and that’s your sense like your mattress ghost bed is made to help with these exact issues i have one it’s just you know that it’s made better right when you see it the materials the way that the uh the edges are seamed the construction the loft all of it is just so much better you get 101 nights to try it in your home and if you don’t feel the difference which you will but if you magically somehow don’t you can send it back risk-free They have a Memorial Day sale right now, plus an extra 10% off on top of that. So visit GhostBed.com slash Dana and use promo code Dana. That’s GhostBed.com slash Dana, promo code Dana.
SPEAKER 11 :
We are facing the biggest energy security threat in history. Experts are saying we’ve lost 13 million barrels of oil per day, and the effects truly are not priced in yet. If this extends much longer, then look out.
SPEAKER 10 :
Check out the Watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcasts.
SPEAKER 02 :
inhibiting militant adversarial mullahs act what does it spell kane imam inhibiting militant adversarial mullahs act which would bar radicalized leaders of certain religious denominations from being admitted to the united states and it’s a very simple two-page bill And it asks to amend a section of the immigration code to prevent non-immigrant religious worker visas for aliens with the title of imam, grand imam, mufti, grandma, oh my gosh, ayatollahs, all the whole nine yards. The person who introduced this is Congressman Chip Roy from the Great Republic of Texas, who’s also running for AG. He joins us now. via video. Congressman, good to see you. I’m reading the list. So it’s Imam, Grand Imam, Sheikha, which I don’t even know what some of these are. Sheikha, I don’t even know what that is. Grand Mufti, I don’t know how that’s different from an Ayatollah or a Grand Ayatollah versus an Ayatollah. But all of these are real titles. And all of these, it’s interesting because the people who hold them, whenever you want to go hear hate and division, that’s usually the person you go listen to, somebody with that kind of title. Tell us about this bill.
SPEAKER 07 :
Yeah, well, you know, given your knowledge of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, the extent to which you’ve got an infiltration in Texas heavily of essentially the effort to Islamify Texas and the United States. And it’s being driven by imams. It’s being driven by people that are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, obviously CARE. And the purpose of the bill that we put forward is to restrict the abuse of what we’ve currently had on our books under an R1 visa, where you’re able to come here as a cleric or some member of the clergy and picture more innocently, say, a Catholic priest that wants to come here from Italy and come serve in a church here in the United States for some period of time. And so we’ve had that ability, but it’s been being abused now for there to be imams, many of whom are very radicalized, that are pushing this anti-American, anti-Western jihad as part of the overall effort that has been well documented by the Muslim Brotherhood, their 1991 memoranda. but many other things, obviously the Holy Land Foundation with which you’re very familiar in Dallas, Fort Worth. And then now the recent stuff we’re seeing with Epic City and all these mosques growing in Texas. So I’ve done a number of things, as you know, co-founded the Sharia Free America Caucus with Keith Self, another great Texan, my good friend from Collin County. We’ve introduced legislation to pause immigration. We’ve introduced legislation to say that you can denaturalize or remove people who are pushing Islamic propaganda that is anti-Western and pushing Sharia law. And so we’ve been doing a number of things, and this Imam Act is following up on it, and we think it’s important to make that case and make it clearly. Now, it’s difficult because, you know, under Islam, you’re taught that you not only can, but you should lie in order to carry out your efforts to wage jihad on the West. So we’re going to have to work to deal with this. That’s why I proposed last fall— a total freeze across the board on immigration. But I keep introducing these things to highlight it for people so they can know what we’re dealing with, because it is so bad in Collin County, so bad in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. We lighten five and a half million people from majority Muslim countries since 9-11, Dana, and that’s cultural suicide.
SPEAKER 02 :
One of the things that really stuck out to me, because I know that you were working on this before the San Diego protests, story happened. And I wanted, I, this, I mean, I actually made this, I screenshotted this and put this in my notes. Let me just read for people two paragraphs. This has to do with your bill from Daily Signal. It says, in 2010, the New York Times reported that after 9-11, Anwar al-Awlaki, who was a 30-year-old imam at a mosque outside of D.C., became a radical jihadist who declared war on the U.S. He had moved. He was attending Colorado State University. The two terrorists that were involved in the 9-11 attacks heard Anwar al-Awlaki’s sermons at his mosque in San Diego, the very one at the center of the story of the shooting of earlier this week before he moved to Virginia. What strikes me is that all of this information is coming out about that Islamic center, that they’re still preaching this stuff. And this is exactly the kind of thing you’re talking about. And they have visiting imams that come in. And then they come into the country, exactly what your bill would prohibit. They come in the country, and then they go and they have like ceremonies to honor the martyrs of October 7th, for one example.
SPEAKER 07 :
Well, there are multiple Imams in Texas that if you look at their teachings and if you look at the statements they’ve been making, are equally as problematic and are making similar calls to wage jihad on the West. Now, I don’t know if you know Amy Mech. Amy testified in the hearing that I chaired a week and a half ago as the subcommittee on the Constitution chairman. where I had Amy testified as well as, and I know you know this young man, Marco Hunter Lopez, who’s the high school student from Wiley ISD. And he did a great job challenging Jamie Raskin on the issues. And Jamie said, God doesn’t appear in the Constitution. He goes, well, God appears four times in the Declaration. He went toe-to-toe with Jamie. The point being, we’ve got a effort that is underway very specifically to target us and to deconstruct our Judeo-Christian society and replace it with an Islamic one. And as Amy said about all this, she does not wish any of the ill, the shooters that went into this mosque in San Diego, and that shouldn’t be the way we do things. But highlighted in her same thread all of these things that have come out of that mosque and come out of the Islamic centers around it. And this matters. This is what’s happening, and it’s being promoted and pushed. And the last conversation I had with Charlie Kirk, Dana, last summer, and I don’t talk about those kinds of things very much, but on one subject I do. It was about Islam. It was about, he had given a speech in Oxford. I’d given a fiery speech on the House floor about how it was not just London and not just Paris. It’s here, it’s Dearborn, it’s New York, it’s Minneapolis. And we’re seeing this unfold. And we agreed that you cannot win a war you don’t acknowledge exists. This war is being waged against us purposely in Texas. So this is one of the reasons that animated me to run for attorney general. This is the fight of our day. We’re either going to win this one or we’re not going to be the country that we are.
SPEAKER 02 :
And it’s so insane. We’re talking with Congressman Chip Roy that there’s that Texas is so heavily targeted. I mean, I have my own ideas as to why that may be. Maybe it’s oil and gas. I don’t know. But how do you explain that? Because this is a topic of conversation that I’ve had with every friend for weeks now.
SPEAKER 07 :
So I think it’s multiple things. One, I think we’re targeted because we are the crown jewel of the American Republic, right? If you take down Texas, if you establish a beachhead here in Texas, then America’s in trouble. And then they can really stick a stake in the heart of the West. Number two, Texas makes it kind of easy. to our credit, we’re a very free state. And so we take freedom very seriously. And so if somebody wants to go buy up some land and then go build a mosque and build some housing and stuff, it’s a little bit easier to do because we tend to say, well, go do your thing. But what I’m trying to remind people here is that we have a responsibility to not allow this stuff to occur and allow Sharia compounds to exist and to allow this march of Islam through Texas because they are in fact waging war against our way of life. I think it’s also a third problem, Dana, is our kind of automatic deference as Republicans to corporate America. And this is something that isn’t always popular to say as a conservative Republican. But at some point, you got to go, look, economic growth is really important. I’m for it. I’m for free flow of capital, free enterprise, capitalism. I’ll die on that hill to fight for it. But When boardrooms in New York are more concerned about earnings per share, and when governors and leaders of the red states across our country are looking through that lens rather than making sure we’re also protecting our culture, our community, and who we are, then suddenly you have a mass influx of people under H-1B visas, or your big universities are now all in coordination with big corporate America in order to have labor, but they’re coming from all over the world and they’re not American workers here. I just think that’s something we’ve got to be mindful of. And now I think we’re paying the consequences. And by the way, I’m saying this going a while back. That’s not directed at any particular leader of our state or anybody else. I’m just saying culturally, we Republicans are deferential to corporate interests.
SPEAKER 02 :
Yeah, I think that’s fair. I have two questions for you talking with Congressman Chip Roy. And that makes sense, too. And the H-1B visa thing is something that we’ve got to get a handle on. I kind of want to switch gears because obviously the other big topic of conversation is what happened with Kentucky. Just the other night. I know you’re I’ve known Congressman Thomas Massey for a long time. You’ve known him even longer and you know him better and you worked with him. I kind of wanted to get your thoughts on how everything unfolded with that. I mean, what is I think maybe there’s a lesson to be learned that what happens in podcast to stand doesn’t necessarily happen in the real world. And that online influence does has its limits, does have its limits.
SPEAKER 07 :
Yeah, look, I think, let me say first, it’s a shame that someone who I know to be such a devoted believer in the Constitution and limited government and low spending and has devoted a good chunk of his life to fighting for that, that this has kind of resulted in this now. It’s like we’ve had so many bad members of Congress and so many bad senators that have been destroying our country for decades. And Thomas ends up with the crosshairs on his back. Okay. And look, Thomas pokes the bear. He’s picked at the scab on a number of different issues that I think raised the hackles of not just the president, but a lot of people. And I’ve had private conversations with Thomas that I won’t get into here on the air about, hey, Maybe this is not the right lane to be in at this moment. Let’s stay focused on what we’re trying to do on limited government, the Constitution, the Second Amendment, ending warrantless surveillance on Americans. All of those things where I think Thomas added so much value to the fabric of Congress. But, you know, if you’re going to poke the bear a lot and do it directly and kind of for the sake of it, then this kind of thing is the result.
SPEAKER 02 :
I mean, I don’t even know if I necessarily think it was him just going after Trump because he went after Trump before and he like sailed through a reelection with double digits. But the thing that seemed different to me is he was palling around with podcast to stand and he made it all about the Jews. I mean, they keep saying the Epstein class, but let’s be real. It’s just because a lot of people, including some of the colleagues in Congress, they just won’t they don’t have the spine to go out and say they have a problem with Jewish people.
SPEAKER 07 :
Well, this is one of the areas where I broke and had strong disagreement with my good friend from Kentucky. And I’m a strong defender of Israel and standing with Israel, but not just that, but just largely making sure that we’re doing the right thing and recognizing our shared interests, national security interests, taking on Iran, not cozying up with Iran because you’re somehow mad at whatever’s going on in Israel. I mean, this is crazy. We’ve gotta stand up in defense of our national security. And look, This is, you know, you can, and by the way, I’m actually an example where you can actually draw some lines, but not lose your mind. So, for example, I voted for full funding for Israel because I believe in it. I voted to defend them. I passed the International Criminal Court sanctioned bill, and I got a call from the prime minister thanking me for it. I’ve been a strong advocate. But I did vote against a bill that made some of my friends in the pro-Israel community unhappy that was Ukraine funding plus Israel because it didn’t include funding to secure the border of Texas. And that was one of my lines in the sand in the previous administration. So you can make decisions that you think are right, but sometimes you get out in that lane, and I think you say it well with sort of podcast-istan. I kind of like that. I’ll probably steal that phraseology. Go right ahead. Because, well, because it’s kind of right. I mean, just, I don’t know, some things, some folks in this world just kind of went off the reservation in some form of derangement syndrome that isn’t even, to your point, it isn’t even really Trump derangement syndrome. They just kind of went off in this lane. And I think that kind of blew up. But again, I wish Thomas well. And, you know, he lost his wonderful bride, Rhonda, you know, a couple of years ago. And, you know.
SPEAKER 02 :
There’s a lot of, yeah, a lot of things that contributed to it. God bless him. It was sad to see. Last question for you, because this is the question, and it has to do with your race for attorney general. So I was reading a couple of things like Axios and Politico and all the people on K Street are all rubbing their hands together going, well, what would an AG Chip Roy do? And one of the first things that they brought up is, oh my gosh, if we have an AG Chip Roy, is he going to investigate Ken Paxton? And apparently that’s one of the things that was being whispered around in the White House. So how do you answer that question? Because I don’t know if anyone’s ever put it to you directly. If you become attorney general, would you investigate Ken Paxton?
SPEAKER 07 :
It’s so absurd the way these whisper campaigns start. They’re done intentionally. I’ll tell you first that the big problem is there’s a lot of people in the Austin swamp, which has ever been as big as the DC swamp, that don’t want an outsider to come into Austin and shake it up. That’s really a lot of what’s going on. So these whisper campaigns get started, which are totally and demonstrably false. First of all, I’ve saw somebody say, Chip Roy’s gonna impeach Ken Paxman. Well, that’s not even a thing.
SPEAKER 02 :
Yeah, you can’t even do that.
SPEAKER 07 :
Second of all, Right, second of all is, well, he’s gonna investigate him. But for what? I mean, look, there was questions that were addressed in the House and the Senate. The Senate acquitted the Attorney General. The Attorney General is now very likely going to be our nominee for Senate next Tuesday. And look, I’ve known Ken for 15 years. When I had cancer, I was his first assistant attorney general. Look, I’ve had some differences of opinion with him. I’ve had differences of opinion with lots of people in public office. Welcome to the world, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson had differences of opinion. But at the end of the day, we gotta all lock arms together and go beat Tallarico and go beat Democrats and go beat Nathan Johnson and stave off the absolute insanity that is radical Marxist and radical Islamism that’s attacking Texas. So under no circumstances, I’m gonna be going after Ken Paxton. It’s one of the most ridiculous things that I’ve seen out there in the Twitterverse and all of the so-called influencers and the chattering that’s going on out there. It’s completely false. There’s no truth to it. Somebody even tried to say one of those influencers said he’s already got a team assembled to go do it. I saw that too, yeah. Literally made up nonsense, which I’ve said is nonsense. But we’ve got a job to do, we’re at war. I said it before, they wanna take Texas away from us. Let’s keep our eyes focused on the prize. How about you take a guy who’s got the number one America first voting record in all of Congress, a demonstrable track record for being a lawyer in court. a federal prosecutor, the former first assistant attorney general, somebody who knows these issues very well. And let’s get busy working as the attorney general. By the way, I’ve won tough general election races. I beat Wendy Davis in 2020 in an R plus three district. I know how to do it. And that’s what we need this fall.
SPEAKER 02 :
There we go. Congressman Chip Roy, also running for AG. And that put that question to bed. So now maybe the internet can stop gossiping about it. Good to talk with you. We’ll talk again soon.
SPEAKER 01 :
God bless.
SPEAKER 02 :
Take care. All right, folks. So I want to tell you about something that actually works. This is the world’s number one expanding garden hose and their newest upgrade. It’s the pocket hose ballistic. I like anything that has the word ballistic after it. I don’t have time for cheap stupid equipment that fails after one season. I am done fighting with it. I’m done with the kinks, Eric Swalwell. I’m done with the tangles. I’m done with the leaks. I’m done with all of it. It’s a waste of money. It’s enraging. So that’s why the pocket hose ballistic, that’s why you need to have this thing because it’s built different. I could beat somebody to death with this. It’s made, it’s reinforced with a liquid crystal polymer. Now you don’t know what that is, but you do know what it’s been used in before, bulletproof vests. So that means my friends, the strength is real, real durability, no nonsense. It’s not going to mess up your garden. It’s not going to like tie a knot around you. If you’re tired of replacing your cheap hose every year, this is your fix. The ballistic is lightweight. It’s super easy to handle. And I like what comes with it. It comes with the pocket pivot. So no more fighting the spigot. And ladies, it’s gold. Where it moves, you move, you move, it moves. It’s so simple. It’s smart. You’re done. For a limited time, when you purchase a new pocket hose ballistic, you’re going to get that free. You see it right here. 360 degree rotating pocket pivot and A free thumb drive nozzle. Just text Dana to 6430. That’s Dana to 64000 for your two free gifts with purchase. Message and data rates may apply.
SPEAKER 08 :
And now, all of the news you would probably miss. It’s time for Dana’s Quick Five.
SPEAKER 02 :
Michael Bay is set to direct a feature film about two pilots who were rescued from Iran during Operation Epic Fury earlier this year. He’s working with the 13 Hours writer Scott Gardner and producer Erwin Stoff to make it. This is according to Variety, who reported that. I mean, of course, it’s perfect that Michael Bay is doing it, by the way. You know, he did 13 Hour Secret Soldiers of Benghazi. He’s done Transformers. He’s done everything with loud explosions. That’s probably him. But the book, there’s a book that’s upcoming about the incident as well. And it’s based on a book from Mitchell Zuckoff, who that’s not coming out till next year from HarperCollins. But it’s already been optioned. And then Garden Hour is adapting the script for that. So it’s going to be interesting. And Bay’s got a long history of working with the military to add realism to his films like Pearl Harbor, 13 Hours, Transformers, all of that stuff. So that’ll be a very interesting film. So that’s coming from Michael Bay. More than half of what Americans eat is ultra-processed food. This coming from a new survey, a panel of 14 nutrition and policy experts. They recommend identifying ultra processed foods by their ingredients. But apparently more than half of all calories that are eaten by American adults come from ultra processed foods. And they’re trying to get like a hardcore definition of it, I guess, to make it. All you have to know is if it’s like super packaged and if every little thing is wrapped in plastic, it’s probably ultra processed. This is not rocket science. We don’t need the government to pay people to come and tell you the obvious. and 30 seconds of burst activity could be effective therapy for people who have panic disorder it’s just a good thing overall generally to do for your health anyway coming up the more more fallout from the election yes massey did lose fair and square stick with us we have a lot more on the way as we move our partners over at noble gold uh they it’s a great timing for this noble gold they understand that gold people wait when there are when you’re in a time of uncertainty But gold doesn’t wait, right? Gold does not wait for ceasefires. They don’t wait to see what markets do. They don’t wait on the straightforward moves. Gold moves on instability, on the unknown, on fear. And so Noble Gold Investments has been shepherding people through this whole system, helping them to protect their savings. with physical gold and silver. They’ve been doing it for nearly a decade. It’s a white glove service. They walk you through everything step by step. So whether it’s, you know, you’re buying physical gold or you’re rolling over a part of an IRA, you’re going to get the answers that you want and get the direction from Noble Gold Investments. There’s no high-pressure sales pitch. They educate you about this. Their team makes it super simple to understand. It’s real investor-level knowledge, but without all the Wall Street nonsense. Don’t wait for certainty that may never come. Visit noblegoldinvestments.com slash Dana. That’s noblegoldinvestments.com slash Dana. Download your free investor kit today. No pressure, no obligation, just the information. That’s noblegoldinvestments.com slash Dana. And do not forget Substack. A lot of good stuff open that’s up there that goes out regularly. And you always are going to get some really good information. One of the things that we’re going to be watching because now, you know, Tuesday we got coming up the election on Tuesday is in Texas. That’s going to be the runoff in the Senate race. It’s going to be the AG, all of that. And then that’s going to be the ultimate election. determination. Wednesday, I’m going to be unpacking all of that with you going over because I’m really interested to see the voting, if the voter trends have changed from 2020 to now, because it was really interesting. I talked to you about Republican voting in the 2020 race when Cornyn ran and how he ended up getting because of split ticket voting. It’s not because of people cheat. People didn’t cheat. They didn’t just not vote for Trump. And then they were going to cheat. They wouldn’t have voted for any Republican down ballot. But that’s what ended up happening. But now Cornyn’s popularity has waned, especially after the fake bipartisan gun control bill that Joe Biden, that Cornyn worked on with under the Biden-Harris administration. So I’m curious to see how much that impacts, because that’s a huge issue with Texas voters. Not just that, but they’re concerned about some of the Islamification of Texas and all kinds of stuff. So It’ll be very interesting to track that. And then, of course, Maine, you’ve got Graham Plattner, who Democrats went from accusing everybody of making it like, did you just salute like a Nazi? Like they accused everybody on the right who maybe would sneeze and put their hand in front of their mouth of doing a Nazi salute. Now you’ve got a guy who literally has Nazi tattoos and then who recently mocked a U.S. soldier who died trying to protect his squad as saying, quote, the stupid blinker didn’t deserve to live. Talking about that, talking that way about a gold star soldier.
SPEAKER 08 :
unbelievable and this is the guy they’re backing democrats have no excuse today in stupidity king speaking of democrats without excuses cut 11 juan this is bernie sanders man he sounds a lot like a cheerleader for communism here but let’s hear i think trump’s actions in venezuela were illegal and unconstitutional i think his actions in iran
SPEAKER 09 :
are unconstitutional and illegal. And I think what he is doing now, starting to do in Cuba, is unconstitutional and illegal.
SPEAKER 02 :
And first off, the 2004 authorized use of military force, if he really felt that way, he would have modified that, which actually includes Iran. So that’s a stupid, ridiculous argument from Bernie Sanders. I don’t want to hear any accusations of illegal anything because none of these people who’ve been sitting in these seats the entire time have done nothing to modify that 2004 AUMF. And that’s it.
SPEAKER 08 :
I’m sorry it’s happening to him, but he’ll get over it.
SPEAKER 02 :
He’ll get over it. Cope and seethe. Cope and seethe. I hope all of you have a wonderful weekend. I’m going to be back Wednesday. It’s Memorial Day weekend. And so, as always, for everyone who has served, we’re very, very grateful. And I’ll be back with you Wednesday. Watch Substack, Chapter and Verse, Facebook, X, Podcast, all the good stuff.
SPEAKER 04 :
Lots of places can expose you to identity theft. That’s why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats to your identity, which is way more than anyone can do on their own. If we find anything suspicious, like new loans or changes to your financial accounts, we alert you right away. All through text, phone, email, or the LifeLock app. Save up to 30% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com slash iHeart. Terms apply.
